AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Talent acquisition › Recruitment marketing › Teamtailor vs Zoho Recruit
Recruitment marketing and career sites · October 2026 Edition

Teamtailor vs Zoho Recruit

Five of fourteen models named Teamtailor first on the direct prompt; zero named Zoho Recruit. Teamtailor was named by thirteen of the fourteen models and Zoho Recruit by fourteen and Teamtailor carries 30 labels and Zoho Recruit 15, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Teamtailor

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Zoho Recruit

accepted challenger

Named in nine categories this edition.

First-choice share23%10%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate7%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 17; printed, not drawn.
Labels3015A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Teamtailor reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Teamtailor vs Workable · Teamtailor vs TalentLyft · Teamtailor vs Gem

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the recruitment marketing and career sites page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
TeamtailorFirst choices, of fourteen modelsZoho Recruit
Direct50
Paraphrase60
Comparative10
Budget-constrained16
Scale-constrained20
Negative002 against Teamtailor
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Teamtailor and Zoho Recruit stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Teamtailor Zoho Recruit first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Teamtailor on the left and Zoho Recruit on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Teamtailor and Zoho Recruit stood in it.

Teamtailor first, Zoho Recruit not the choice

5 of 14 modelsZoho Recruit was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Gemini 3.5 FlashGem, Teamtailor alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever, Pinpoint
DeepSeek V4 Flash100Hires, Teamtailor alternatives: Recruitee
Kimi K2Teamtailor alternatives: Greenhouse, Lever, Workable
GLM 4.7 FlashXTeamtailor alternatives: Ashby, Lever
MiniMax M2.5Teamtailor alternatives: Beamery, SmartRecruiters

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Claude Haiku 4.5Greenhouse, SmartRecruiters alternatives: Jobilla, Teamtailor
GPT-5.4 miniJobvite alternatives: Appcast, Teamtailor
Perplexity SonarPhenom alternatives: Joveo, Teamtailor, Workable
Grok 4.1 FastSmartRecruiters alternatives: Lever, Teamtailor
Qwen 3.7 Flash100Hires alternatives: Gem, SmartRecruiters, Teamtailor
GPT-6 LunaGem alternatives: Teamtailor
Muse Glimmer 30BJobvite, Workable alternatives: Teamtailor

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallGem alternatives: SmartRecruiters
Llama 4 Maverickno first choice

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Zoho Recruit leads by five points.
Zoho Recruit12%#2 of 14
Teamtailor7%#6 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
The order flips: Teamtailor leads at mid-market.
Teamtailor23%#1 of 17
Zoho Recruit10%#2 of 17
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
Level: the same share of first choices.
Teamtailor0%#– of 13
Zoho Recruit0%#– of 13
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Teamtailor

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“flag Teamtailor for "limited customization on Teamtailor, restricting their ability to personalize the career site fully"” Muse Glimmer 30B · negative prompt · soft negative
“Limited customization options for career sites ... Integration issues” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · soft negative
“platforms like Teamtailor and Recruitee are often cited for mid-market teams that want a great career site without an enterprise sales cycle” Muse Glimmer 30B · scale prompt · first choice
“Teamtailor (Best Overall for Employer Branding & Ease of Use) ... widely considered the gold standard for mid-market employer branding” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Look for modern, agile platforms (such as Gem, Clinch, or Teamtailor) where implementation takes weeks, not quarters.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

What the models said about Zoho Recruit

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Two of two in this category shown.

“For companies with very limited budgets, Zoho Recruit or Breezy HR are excellent starting points since they offer robust free tiers.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · budget prompt · first choice
“If you need a system from scratch: Choose Zoho Recruit. It provides the most feature-rich environment for $0–$50/month.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · budget prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.