Technical hiring assessments · October 2026 Edition
HackerRank vs DevSkiller
Three of fourteen models named HackerRank first on the direct prompt; one named DevSkiller. HackerRank was named by fourteen of the fourteen models and DevSkiller by nine and HackerRank carries 64 labels and DevSkiller 10, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in five categories this edition.
Named in two categories this edition.
First-choice share17%2%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate22%0%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#8A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels6410A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, HackerRank reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.CodeSignal was named alongside these two in ten of the fourteen direct answers. HackerRank vs CodeSignal · HackerRank vs CoderPad · HackerRank vs Coderbyte
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the technical hiring assessments page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
HackerRankFirst choices, of fourteen modelsDevSkiller
Direct31
Paraphrase40
Comparative110
Budget-constrained102 against HackerRank
Scale-constrained20
Negative0012 against HackerRank
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where HackerRank and DevSkiller stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | | ||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | ||
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | |||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | | |||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | ||||
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | | | |
| GPT-6 Luna | | | | | ||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | | |
HackerRank DevSkiller first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, HackerRank on the left and DevSkiller on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where HackerRank and DevSkiller stood in it.
Both were the first choice
1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.Muse Glimmer 30BCodeSignal, DevSkiller, HackerRank alternatives: Codility
HackerRank first, DevSkiller not the choice
2 of 14 modelsDevSkiller was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.GPT-5.4 miniHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, Codility
Grok 4.1 FastHackerRank alternatives: CodeSignal, CoderPad, Coderbyte, Codility
Neither was the first choice, one was named
8 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.Perplexity SonarCodeSignal alternatives: Coderbyte, DevSkiller
Mistral SmallGoodfit alternatives: HackerRank
DeepSeek V4 FlashCodility alternatives: CodeSignal, HackerRank
Llama 4 MaverickGoodfit alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank
Kimi K2Coderbyte alternatives: HackerRank, TestGorilla
GLM 4.7 FlashXCodility, TestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal, Coderbyte, HackerRank
MiniMax M2.5Codility alternatives: AssessHub, CoderPad, HackerRank
GPT-6 LunaCodeSignal Hire Grow alternatives: CoderPad, HackerRank
Neither was named
3 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5HackerEarth, TestGorilla alternatives: CodeSignal
Gemini 3.5 FlashCoderPad, Woven alternatives: CodeSignal
Qwen 3.7 FlashCodeSignal alternatives: CoderPad, Codility, TestGorilla, Voomer
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
HackerRank leads by twelve points.
HackerRank12%#4 of 8DevSkiller0%#– of 8Mid-marketThe figures above
HackerRank leads by sixteen points.
HackerRank17%#1 of 9DevSkiller2%#8 of 9Enterprise
HackerRank leads by fifty-one points.
HackerRank51%#1 of 8DevSkiller0%#– of 8What the models said about HackerRank
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.
“LeetCode-style algorithm challenge platforms (e.g., HackerRank, Codility, CodeSignal): While widely used, these are often criticized for not reflecting real-world job tasks” Mistral Small · negative prompt · hard negative
“HackerRank – Low Trustpilot score, no refund policy, no debugger, unreliable AI scoring.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid pricier ones like Codility/HackerRank ($150\u2013$249+/mo) unless scaling up.” Grok 4.1 Fast · budget prompt · hard negative
“used by 40% of Fortune 100 companies and is known for coding challenges, real-world project assessments... making it unmatched for engineering hiring” Claude Haiku 4.5 · comparative prompt · first choice
“Choose HackerRank or Codility if you are an enterprise needing rigorous automated screening with ironclad proctoring” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · first choice
“HackerRank if you are a large company hiring hundreds of developers and need a standardized process.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
What the models said about DevSkiller
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“CodeSignal / DevSkiller are commonly recommended for 50-500 hires mid-market teams” Muse Glimmer 30B · direct prompt · first choice
“CodeSignal or DevSkiller is explicitly listed for *mid-market (50–500 hires)*” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · alternative
“Uses the RealLifeTesting" methodology... realistic code scenarios” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · alternative
Also compared
HackerRank vs CodeSignalHackerRank vs CoderPadHackerRank vs CoderbyteHackerRank vs TestGorillaHackerRank vs CodilityHackerRank vs HackerEarthCodeSignal vs DevSkillerCoderPad vs DevSkillerCoderbyte vs DevSkillerTestGorilla vs DevSkillerCodility vs DevSkillerHackerEarth vs DevSkillerAll twenty-eight head-to-head pages and the full technical hiring assessm standing
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.