Video interviewing · October 2026 Edition
myInterview vs HireVue
Zero of fourteen models named myInterview first on the direct prompt; one named HireVue. myInterview was named by ten of the fourteen models and HireVue by fourteen and myInterview carries 12 labels and HireVue 48, so the shares are not directly comparable.
Named in one category this edition.
Named in eleven categories this edition.
First-choice share4%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%60%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#5#6A position in a field of 9; printed, not drawn.
Labels1248A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, myInterview reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Spark Hire was named alongside these two in fourteen of the fourteen direct answers. Spark Hire vs myInterview · Spark Hire vs HireVue · Willo vs myInterview
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the video interviewing page.
By framing
How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
myInterviewFirst choices, of fourteen modelsHireVue
Direct013 against HireVue
Paraphrase007 against HireVue
Comparative071 against HireVue
Budget-constrained205 against HireVue
Scale-constrained012 against HireVue
Negative0011 against HireVue
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.
Every model, every framing
The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where myInterview and HireVue stood in it.
| Model | Direct | Paraphrase | Comparative | Budget-constrained | Scale-constrained | Negative |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | | |||||
| GPT-5.4 mini | | | | | | |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | | | | | ||
| Perplexity Sonar | | | ||||
| Grok 4.1 Fast | | | | | | |
| Mistral Small | | | | |||
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | | | | | | |
| Llama 4 Maverick | | | ||||
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | | | | | | |
| Kimi K2 | | | | | ||
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | | | | | ||
| MiniMax M2.5 | | | | |||
| GPT-6 Luna | | | ||||
| Muse Glimmer 30B | | | |
myInterview HireVue first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, myInterview on the left and HireVue on the right.The direct prompt
The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where myInterview and HireVue stood in it.
HireVue first, myInterview not the choice
1 of 14 modelsmyInterview was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.Qwen 3.7 FlashHireVue alternatives: Modern Hire, Spark Hire, Talmatic, VidCruiter
Neither was the first choice, one was named
2 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.GPT-5.4 miniSpark Hire alternatives: HireVue, VidCruiter
GPT-6 LunaSpark Hire alternatives: HireVue, VidCruiter
Neither was named
11 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.Claude Haiku 4.5Spark Hire alternatives: HackerRank
Gemini 3.5 FlashSpark Hire alternatives: BrightHire, Metaview, VidCruiter, Willo
Perplexity SonarSpark Hire alternatives: Rework, VidCruiter
Grok 4.1 FastSpark Hire alternatives: Hireflix, VidCruiter, Willo
Mistral SmallSpark Hire alternatives: Breezy HR, VidCruiter
DeepSeek V4 FlashSpark Hire alternatives: Willo
Llama 4 MaverickSpark Hire alternatives: VidCruiter
Kimi K2Spark Hire, interviewstream alternatives: Hireflix, VidCruiter
GLM 4.7 FlashXSpark Hire alternatives: Hireflix, Willo
MiniMax M2.5Spark Hire alternatives: VidCruiter, interviewstream
Muse Glimmer 30BSpark Hire alternatives: Breezy, VidCruiter
Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
myInterview leads by eight points.
myInterview8%#5 of 11HireVue0%#11 of 11Mid-marketThe figures above
Level: the same share of first choices.
myInterview4%#5 of 9HireVue4%#6 of 9Enterprise
The order flips: HireVue leads at enterprise.
HireVue66%#1 of 6myInterview0%#– of 6What the models said about myInterview
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.
“The best video interviewing platform for a company with a limited budget is myInterview, as it offers a genuine free tier” Llama 4 Maverick · budget prompt · first choice
“myInterview is likely your best choice” Mistral Small · budget prompt · first choice
“Best to try for free: myInterview because it offers a genuine free tier” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · alternative
What the models said about HireVue
Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.
“The Case of HireVue: HireVue is one of the largest enterprise video hiring tools, but it has faced intense scrutiny.... the ACLU filed an EEOC complaint against Intuit and HireVue” Gemini 3.5 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid or Approach with Caution ### HireVue - Why be cautious: Face intense criticism for facial-expression analysis and AI bias” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · hard negative
“HireVue | Enterprise-scale structured interviews | AI-driven, live + async, solid for 500-person companies expanding” DeepSeek V4 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“The Best All-Rounder: HireVue ... For mid-market companies looking for structure and data, it is the safest bet.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“HireVue and VidCruiter lead in enterprise‑grade AI assessments and compliance, with higher price points.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared
Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.