AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › ADP Vantage · October 2026 Edition
ADP · 1 category · Named, not ranked

ADP Vantage

12Judge labels
1First choices
0Negative labels
6 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
1 label, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. ADP Vantage was named 1 time in Benefits administration, where Gusto led with 20%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In benefits administration · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named ADP Vantage for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Benefits administrationCore HR and payroll0%27 of 670%1under 10 labels · led by Gusto at 20%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

Since September 2026, ADP Vantage held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 13 points.

Best category · Benefits administration · by segment

Mid-marketnewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 23 of 62, unchanged
EnterprisenewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 13 pointsRank 24 of 52, unchanged

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
Benefits administration0%0%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.New this editionRank 27 of 67, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 13 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated ADP Vantage across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase3 labels1
Comparative2 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative12 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“ADP Workforce Now / ADP Vantage (Market Leader — ~10.3% share)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Benefits administration · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as ADP Vantage, over the 12 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and ADP Vantage was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Rippling8 of 120Not among the top eight
Dayforce7 of 121Not among the top eight
Workday HCM6 of 123Not among the top eight
UKG Pro6 of 122Not among the top eight
Gusto5 of 120Not among the top eight
BambooHR4 of 120Not among the top eight
SAP SuccessFactors4 of 120Not among the top eight
Workday3 of 121Not among the top eight
ADP Workforce Now3 of 120Not among the top eight
Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM3 of 120Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named ADP Vantage. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 10 of the 12 answers that named ADP Vantage and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com5
adp.comYour site4
hibob.com4
hr.software4
rippling.com4
acciyo.com3
appsruntheworld.com3
learn.g2.com3
outsail.co3
bindbee.dev2

Thirty-one of the thirty-five domain citations in answers naming ADP Vantage came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as ADP Vantage

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as ADP Vantage; a claim can dispute any of them.
ADP Workforce Now / ADP Vantage 1

Follow ADP Vantage

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

ADP is the company behind ADP Vantage.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
ADP Vantage login and support center.
For
Employees, administrators, and accountants
Customers named
PS Logistics
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What ADP Vantage's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: adp.com/logins/adp-vantage-hcm.aspx, adp.com/spark/articles/2017/07/ps-logistics-drives-toward-greater-workforce-visability-and-more-strategic-hr-with-adp-vantage-hcm.aspx. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when ADP Vantage's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as ADP Vantage, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for ADP Vantage by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where ADP Vantage is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name ADP Vantage, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at adp.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.