Every category where a model named AirMason for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
HR compliance and policy management	Core HR and payroll	8%	4 of 84	0%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for AirMason yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated AirMason across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase25 labels7

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Two tools that stand out for this profile are AirMason (for a polished, signed handbook with AI-driven compliance) and Trainual” GLM 4.7 FlashX · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend AirMason as the top employee handbook and policy management tool for a mid-sized B2B company” Grok 4.1 Fast · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with AirMason if compliance and professional presentation are priorities” MiniMax M2.5 · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“AirMason is the strongest contender for the mid-market” Qwen 3.7 Flash · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as AirMason, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and AirMason was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Blissbook18 of 258Not in the top three

Trainual18 of 254Not in the top three

BambooHR8 of 251Not in the top three

Connecteam4 of 251Not in the top three

Handbooks.io4 of 251Not in the top three

SixFifty4 of 251Not in the top three

Notion4 of 250Not in the top three

NAVEX One3 of 252Not in the top three

Guideflow3 of 250Not in the top three

Mitratech PolicyHub1 of 251Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named AirMason. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 25 answers that named AirMason and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

airmason.comYour site23

trainual.com22

peoplemanagingpeople.com21

worldmetrics.org17

blissbook.com16

guideflow.com13

handbooks.io8

zipdo.co8

f6s.com7

gitnux.org6

118 of the 141 domain citations in answers naming AirMason came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

airmason.com/blog/top-20-employee-handbook-software-of-202622

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-employee-handbook-software21

trainual.com/manual/best-employee-handbook-tools-policies21

worldmetrics.org/best/employee-handbook-software17

blissbook.com/14

guideflow.com/blog/employee-handbook-software13

blissbook.com/pricing10

airmason.com/blog/10-best-employee-handbook-software-solutions8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when AirMason's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as AirMason, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at airmason.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.