HR AI Index
Index Vendors › SixFifty · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

SixFifty

43Judge labels
5First choices
1Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
6% in HR compliance for small business buyers
Rank 9 of 84 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 17 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In hr compliance · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SixFifty for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
HR compliance and policy managementCore HR and payroll2%9 of 840%17accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SixFifty yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SixFifty across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash12104
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small01102
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash00101
Kimi K202002
GLM 4.7 FlashX01102
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct11 labels2
Paraphrase5 labels2
Comparative18 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained6 labels1
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Multi-State Compliance & Legal Accuracy: SixFifty” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR compliance · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Another strong option is SixFifty, which is highlighted as the top HR compliance solution specifically for small businesses.” Mistral Small · HR compliance · budget prompt · alternative
“Compliance-only needs: Consider SixFifty for policy and document compliance without full HRIS costs” Kimi K2 · HR compliance · budget prompt · alternative
“you can overlay a specialized compliance platform like SixFifty, Mineral, or Compli” Gemini 3.5 Flash · HR compliance · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SixFifty, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SixFifty was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
BambooHR30 of 436Not in the top three
Rippling29 of 436Not in the top three
Gusto28 of 4314Not in the top three
Justworks20 of 430Not in the top three
Deel18 of 430Not in the top three
Mitratech Mineral14 of 430Not in the top three
Homebase12 of 432Not in the top three
HR Acuity11 of 430Not in the top three
Workday7 of 430Not in the top three
ADP6 of 430Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SixFifty. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 43 answers that named SixFifty and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

peoplemanagingpeople.com32
guideflow.com31
toolradar.com24
fitsmallbusiness.com22
gusto.com18
g2.com15
rippling.com14
worldmetrics.org11
dupple.com10
firsthr.app10

187 of the 187 domain citations in answers naming SixFifty came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SixFifty's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SixFifty, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sixfifty.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack