AI Indexes
HR AI Index
Index › Products › Aviont\u00e9 · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Aviont\u00e9

26Judge labels
0First choices
4Negative labels
11 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Staffing agency tools for enterprise buyers
Rank 20 of 136 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In staffing agency tools · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Aviont\u00e9 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Staffing agency platformsTalent acquisition0%20 of 1360%9under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Aviont\u00e9 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Aviont\u00e9 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash01001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast02002
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna10001
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase1 labelNone
Comparative18 labels2not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Temp/contract staffing with payroll and billing in the system: Start with Aviont\u00e9” GPT-6 Luna · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · first choice
“Best for: Mid-market temp/light industrial B2B staffing with in-house payroll needs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Staffing agency tools · direct prompt · alternative
“Aviont\u00e9 stands out for its mobile-first candidate experience.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · alternative
“Aviont\u00e9 is the strongest all-in-one for temp staffing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Staffing agency tools · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Aviont\u00e9, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Aviont\u00e9 was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Bullhorn26 of 2619Not among the top eight
JobDiva19 of 261Not among the top eight
TempWorks10 of 261Not among the top eight
Vincere8 of 260Not among the top eight
Zoho Recruit7 of 262Not among the top eight
Recruiterflow7 of 261Not among the top eight
Ceipal7 of 260Not among the top eight
Loxo7 of 260Not among the top eight
Recruit CRM6 of 261Not among the top eight
Crelate5 of 260Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Aviont\u00e9. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 26 of the 26 answers that named Aviont\u00e9 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

firsthr.app14
g2.com12
metaview.ai10
bullhorn.com9
pin.com9
peoplemanagingpeople.com8
capterra.com7
connecteam.com7
harver.com7
jazzhr.com7

No domain is on file for Aviont\u00e9, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Aviont\u00e9 stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Searches for its name, Google
not counted (“aviont\u00e9”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
0 a month
Its own site
No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 20 of 136 in staffing agency tools
Segment leader
22%
Zoho Recruit
First choices
0 across its categories
Named in
26 answers
Its own site cited
No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Aviont\u00e9

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aviont\u00e9's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aviont\u00e9, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aviont\u00e9 by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Aviont\u00e9 is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Aviont\u00e9, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.