3 categories · Named, not rankedRecruit CRM
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 83 of 88 | 50% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20% |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 52 of 81 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16% |
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 58 of 77 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Pin at 17% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“It's the safe default for boutique and mid-market staffing agencies that want a clean Kanban workflow” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Recruit CRM - suitable for small-to-midsize agencies, offering a combined ATS + client CRM.” Llama 4 Maverick · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Recruit CRM is a strong alternative for small to midsize teams” Perplexity Sonar · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Guard against the recruiting-agency products. Tools like Recruit CRM, Bullhorn, and Tracker ... you'd be paying for features you don't need” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid CRMs like Bullhorn, Vincere, or Recruit CRM for this use case.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoided agency tools like Recruit CRM/Bullhorn.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Recruiting CRM · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 27 answers that named Recruit CRM and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Eighty-one of the eighty-one domain citations in answers naming Recruit CRM came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Recruit CRM's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Recruit CRM, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at recruitcrm.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.