Every category where a model named Avionté for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Staffing agency platforms	Talent acquisition	0%	33 of 136	0%	2	under 10 labels · led by Zoho Recruit at 22%
Applicant tracking systems	Talent acquisition	0%	36 of 65	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Greenhouse at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Avionté yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Avionté across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels2

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative14 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Avionté | Large commercial staffing, end-to-end | Enterprise pricing” Kimi K2 · Staffing agency tools · scale prompt · alternative

“Recruit CRM and Avionté are also strong contenders” Mistral Small · Staffing agency tools · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Avionté, over the 14 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Avionté was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Bullhorn9 of 148Not among the top eight

JobDiva9 of 141Not among the top eight

Ceipal4 of 140Not among the top eight

Workable4 of 140Not among the top eight

Greenhouse3 of 141Not among the top eight

Vincere3 of 140Not among the top eight

Ceipal ATS2 of 141Not among the top eight

Zoho Recruit2 of 141Not among the top eight

BambooHR2 of 140Not among the top eight

Crelate2 of 140Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Avionté. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 14 of the 14 answers that named Avionté and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

pin.com11

firsthr.app8

assembly.com5

g2.com5

harver.com5

metaview.ai5

peoplemanagingpeople.com5

selectsoftwarereviews.com5

jazzhr.com4

worldmetrics.org4

No domain is on file for Avionté, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/staffing-agency-software8

pin.com/blog/staffing-agency-software8

assembly.com/blog/staffing-agency-software5

harver.com/blog/staffing-agency-software5

jazzhr.com/insights/best-staffing-agency-software4

metaview.ai/resources/blog/recruitment-agency-software4

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/recruiting-and-staffing-agency-software4

carv.com/blog/staffing-agency-ai-software3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Avionté stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: not counted (“avionté”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 52 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 33 of 136 in staffing agency tools

Segment leader

22%

Zoho Recruit

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 14 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Avionté

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Avionté's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Avionté, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Avionté by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Avionté is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Avionté, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.