HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Chanty · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Chanty

3Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Chanty was named 2 times in Frontline employee apps and 1 other category, where Connecteam led with 56%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market35 of 97

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In frontline employee apps · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Chanty for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Frontline employee apps	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	35 of 97	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Connecteam at 56%
Internal communications and intranet	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	51 of 80	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Happeo at 16%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Chanty yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Chanty across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Affordable team messaging alternative to Slack with built-in task management; good for small teams on a budget” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Frontline employee apps · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Chanty, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Chanty was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Slack3 of 31Not in the top three

Microsoft Teams3 of 30Not in the top three

Google Chat2 of 30Not in the top three

Connecteam1 of 31Not in the top three

Flock1 of 30Not in the top three

Pumble1 of 30Not in the top three

Twist1 of 30Not in the top three

Workplace from Meta1 of 30Not in the top three

Zoom Team Chat1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Chanty. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 3 answers that named Chanty and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com2

oak.com2

peoplemanagingpeople.com2

blog.jostle.me1

changeengine.com1

crowntv-us.com1

hrtechsaas.com1

joinblink.com1

mangoapps.com1

siit.io1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Chanty came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

blog.jostle.me/blog/essential-internal-communications-tools1

changeengine.com/articles/frontline-communication-tools1

crowntv-us.com/blog/internal-communication-tools1

guideflow.com/blog/employee-communications-software1

guideflow.com/blog/internal-communications-software-tools1

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-frontline-workforce-communication-apps1

joinblink.com/intelligence/best-employee-communication-apps1

mangoapps.com/articles/best-frontline-communication-software1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Chanty's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Chanty, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at chanty.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.