HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Compa · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Compa

13Judge labels

1First choices

1Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Compa was named 4 times in Compensation management, where Pave led with 18%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business47 of 144

under the label threshold

Mid-market27 of 189

under the label threshold

Enterprise58 of 144

under the label threshold

In compensation management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Compa for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	1%	27 of 189	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Compa yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Compa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd suggest starting with Compa if you want the best benchmarking data and pay range management” Kimi K2 · Compensation management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Large enterprise with complex structures? → Compa or beqom” Kimi K2 · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative

“AI-driven compensation decisions → Compa” MiniMax M2.5 · Compensation management · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Compa, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Compa was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Pave12 of 134Not in the top three

beqom7 of 132Not in the top three

Figures7 of 130Not in the top three

Ravio7 of 130Not in the top three

Mercer6 of 130Not in the top three

Payscale6 of 130Not in the top three

Radford5 of 130Not in the top three

Comprehensive4 of 130Not in the top three

WTW4 of 130Not in the top three

Workday Compensation3 of 132Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Compa. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 13 answers that named Compa and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

comprehensive.io7

guideflow.com7

ravio.com6

gartner.com5

bestrecruitingtools.com4

learn.g2.com4

worldmetrics.org4

compport.com3

figures.hr3

g2.com3

Forty-six of the forty-six domain citations in answers naming Compa came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/compensation-management-software7

comprehensive.io/content/best-compensation-management-software6

gartner.com/reviews/market/compensation-management-software5

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software-enterprise-20264

learn.g2.com/best-compensation-management-software4

ravio.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software4

hibob.com/blog/best-compensation-management-software3

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-compensation-benchmarking-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Compa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Compa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at companylms.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.