Every category where a model named Compt for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts	Compensation and total rewards	30%	1 of 76	0%	39	accepted challenger
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	40 of 99	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Compt yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Compt across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	2
GPT-5.4 mini	2	0	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	2	4	0	6
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	2	1	5
Mistral Small	1	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	2	0	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	2
Kimi K2	1	2	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	2	2	5

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct36 labels20

Paraphrase7 labels3

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained33 labels21

Scale-constrained21 labels7

Negative6 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative117 labels in all, every segment counted; 51 of the 54 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The best lifestyle spending account platform for a company with a limited budget is Compt, as it is the top-ranked LSA provider for 2026” Llama 4 Maverick · Flexible benefits · budget prompt · first choice

“Compt stands out as one of the best lifestyle spending account (LSA) platforms, especially for small to medium-sized businesses” Grok 4.1 Fast · Flexible benefits · budget prompt · first choice

“Prioritize platforms with proven mid-market success (e.g., Compt for reimbursements, Benepass for cards).” Grok 4.1 Fast · Flexible benefits · scale prompt · first choice

“Compt is a top choice for mid‑market B2B companies... I'd start by shortlisting Compt and Forma” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Flexible benefits · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Compt, over the 117 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Compt was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Benepass92 of 11717Compare →

Forma83 of 11718Compare →

Espresa31 of 1170Not in the top three

JOON30 of 11711Not in the top three

Fringe28 of 1171Not in the top three

ThrivePass20 of 1170Not in the top three

Gusto11 of 1171Not in the top three

Rippling11 of 1170Not in the top three

Wellable5 of 1172Not in the top three

Holisticly5 of 1171Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Compt. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 96 of the 117 answers that named Compt and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

compt.ioYour site85

guideflow.com79

getbenepass.com76

g2.com67

joinforma.com61

f6s.com33

espresa.com27

medium.com26

us.fitgap.com25

myshortlister.com24

418 of the 503 domain citations in answers naming Compt came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

compt.io/blog/15-best-lifestyle-spending-account-providers77

guideflow.com/blog/lifestyle-spending-account-software69

compt.io/blog/benepass-alternatives-for-lifestyle-spending-accounts-lsas65

getbenepass.com/blog/lifestyle-spending-account-vendors60

joinforma.com/resources/lifestyle-spending-account-providers34

joinforma.com/resources/best-personalized-benefits-platforms28

compt.io/27

g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-most-trusted-lifestyle-spending-account-platforms-by-benef26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Compt's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Compt, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at compt.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.