Every category where a model named Espresa for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts	Compensation and total rewards	0%	17 of 76	10%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Espresa yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Espresa across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	1	4
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative4 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labelsNone

Scale-constrained11 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Recognition + broad marketplace; taxable rewards; less emphasis on tax-advantaged accounts. G2: 4.1/5.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Flexible benefits · comparative prompt · alternative

“Espresa or ThrivePass are worth evaluating.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Flexible benefits · direct prompt · alternative

“Espresa (engagement + spending)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Flexible benefits · comparative prompt · alternative

“Espresa (total rewards)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Flexible benefits · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid higher-end ones like Benepass/Forma/Espresa” Grok 4.1 Fast · Flexible benefits · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Espresa, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Espresa was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Benepass32 of 346Not in the top three

Compt31 of 3412Not in the top three

Forma29 of 3411Not in the top three

ThrivePass13 of 340Not in the top three

Fringe8 of 340Not in the top three

JOON7 of 344Not in the top three

Benify3 of 340Not in the top three

PeopleKeep3 of 340Not in the top three

ADP2 of 340Not in the top three

Rippling2 of 340Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Espresa. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 34 answers that named Espresa and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

compt.io26

getbenepass.com24

g2.com23

guideflow.com22

joinforma.com21

espresa.comYour site17

f6s.com10

medium.com10

us.fitgap.com9

findalternatives.net7

152 of the 169 domain citations in answers naming Espresa came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

compt.io/blog/15-best-lifestyle-spending-account-providers23

compt.io/blog/benepass-alternatives-for-lifestyle-spending-accounts-lsas22

guideflow.com/blog/lifestyle-spending-account-software21

getbenepass.com/blog/lifestyle-spending-account-vendors20

joinforma.com/resources/lifestyle-spending-account-providers13

medium.com/coderbyte/the-8-best-lifestyle-spending-accounts-lsa-in-2023-4d8ce4f99aaf10

g2.com/discussions/what-are-the-most-trusted-lifestyle-spending-account-platforms-by-benef9

compt.io/8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Espresa's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Espresa, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at espresa.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.