HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › PeopleKeep · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

PeopleKeep

9Judge labels

0First choices

2Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. PeopleKeep was named 4 times in Flexible benefits and 1 other category, where Compt led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business16 of 73

under the label threshold

Mid-market24 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprise49 of 69

under the label threshold

In flexible benefits · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named PeopleKeep for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts	Compensation and total rewards	0%	24 of 76	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30%
Benefits administration	Core HR and payroll	0%	43 of 54	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by PlanSource at 23%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for PeopleKeep yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated PeopleKeep across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative9 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for Micro-Businesses Under 50 Employees” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Flexible benefits · budget prompt · alternative

“PeopleKeep (HRA/admin-focused)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Flexible benefits · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“PeopleKeep has some documented issues worth noting.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Benefits administration · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as PeopleKeep, over the 9 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and PeopleKeep was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Compt5 of 92Not in the top three

Benepass5 of 91Not in the top three

Forma4 of 91Not in the top three

Gusto3 of 91Not in the top three

Espresa3 of 90Not in the top three

BambooHR2 of 90Not in the top three

JOON2 of 90Not in the top three

WEX2 of 90Not in the top three

OnPay1 of 91Not in the top three

ADP Workforce Now1 of 90Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named PeopleKeep. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 9 answers that named PeopleKeep and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getbenepass.com7

g2.com5

guideflow.com5

joinforma.com5

compt.io4

rippling.com3

abigsolutions.com2

espresa.com2

gusto.com2

linkedin.com2

Thirty-seven of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming PeopleKeep came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/lifestyle-spending-account-software5

getbenepass.com/blog/lifestyle-spending-account-vendors4

compt.io/blog/15-best-lifestyle-spending-account-providers3

compt.io/blog/benepass-alternatives-for-lifestyle-spending-accounts-lsas3

joinforma.com/resources/best-personalized-benefits-platforms3

abigsolutions.com/blog/top-10-employee-benefits-platforms-for-small-businesses-20252

compt.io/blog/thrivepass-alternatives-lifestyle-spending-account-lsa2

getbenepass.com/blog/benefits-administration-software2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as PeopleKeep

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as PeopleKeep; a claim can dispute any of them.

PeopleKeep (WorkPerks) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when PeopleKeep's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as PeopleKeep, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at peoplekeep.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.