HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Wellable · September 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Wellable

111Judge labels
29First choices
3Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
3Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
30% in Employee wellbeing for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 99 in the mid-market standingendorsed leader
11 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 36 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wellable for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience30%1 of 990%36endorsed leader
Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accountsCompensation and total rewards0%58 of 760%1under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30%
Recognition and rewardsOnboarding and employee experience0%47 of 550%1under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wellable yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wellable across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.521003
GPT-5.4 mini21003
Gemini 3.5 Flash01102
Perplexity Sonar21003
Grok 4.1 Fast10304
Mistral Small11305
DeepSeek V4 Flash12003
Llama 4 Maverick10203
Qwen 3.7 Flash10102
Kimi K213004
GLM 4.7 FlashX20103
MiniMax M2.521003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct30 labels19
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative32 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained30 labels9
Scale-constrained13 labels1
Negative6 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative111 labels in all, every segment counted; 29 of the 37 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“For most mid-market B2B companies, Wellable offers the best combination of engagement, flexibility, pricing, and ease of deployment” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice
“Wellable and GoPivot are the top choices due to their scalability, feature sets, and proven track records with mid-market clients” Mistral Small · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Wellable if your main struggle is low engagement/buy-in and you want a fun, gamified interface.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice
“Wellable typically offers the best balance of flexibility and ease for mid-market B2B companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wellable, over the 110 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wellable was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Personify Health53 of 11013Not in the top three
Headspace38 of 1102Not in the top three
Wellhub35 of 1103Not in the top three
Vantage Fit29 of 1104Not in the top three
YuMuuv26 of 1105Not in the top three
Avidon Health25 of 1107Not in the top three
Limeade23 of 1102Not in the top three
Calm22 of 1102Not in the top three
Wellness36021 of 1100Not in the top three
Sprout at Work20 of 1101Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wellable. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 110 answers that named Wellable and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com69
guideflow.com60
peoplemanagingpeople.com54
avidonhealth.com51
gopivotsolutions.com47
vantagefit.io42
hrtechsaas.com33
deskbreak.app31
g2.com30
firsthr.app28

445 of the 445 domain citations in answers naming Wellable came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wellable

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wellable; a claim can dispute any of them.
Wellable Lite 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wellable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wellable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wellable.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack