| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee wellbeing and mental health | Onboarding and employee experience | 30% | 1 of 99 | 0% | 36 | endorsed leader |
| Flexible benefits and lifestyle spending accounts | Compensation and total rewards | 0% | 58 of 76 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Compt at 30% |
| Recognition and rewards | Onboarding and employee experience | 0% | 47 of 55 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Bonusly at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“For most mid-market B2B companies, Wellable offers the best combination of engagement, flexibility, pricing, and ease of deployment” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice
“Wellable and GoPivot are the top choices due to their scalability, feature sets, and proven track records with mid-market clients” Mistral Small · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice
“Choose Wellable if your main struggle is low engagement/buy-in and you want a fun, gamified interface.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice
“Wellable typically offers the best balance of flexibility and ease for mid-market B2B companies” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 110 answers that named Wellable and are not a share of its labels.
445 of the 445 domain citations in answers naming Wellable came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wellable's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wellable, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wellable.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.