1 category · RankedHeadspace
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employee wellbeing and mental health | Onboarding and employee experience | 2% | 8 of 99 | 24% | 29 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 4 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Headspace for Business is the best value if you only need to address mental wellness” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice
“Headspace – Strong evidence base for meditation, though no major privacy scandals” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose based on goals: meditation (Headspace/Calm)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · first choice
“The most recognized meditation brand, strong on stress reduction, sleep, and mindfulness content” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Headspace collects a wide range of personal information including health data... shares user data with third-party platforms for targeted advertising” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · negative prompt · hard negative
“Examples include Calm, Happify, Headspace, and Moodfit.” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee wellbeing · negative prompt · hard negative
“criticism for being "data-hungry" and failing to provide clinical robustness for serious conditions” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee wellbeing · negative prompt · soft negative
“Headspace (though it has improved transparency with a "My Data" hub)” Kimi K2 · Employee wellbeing · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 56 of the 69 answers that named Headspace and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
220 of the 220 domain citations in answers naming Headspace came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Names read as Headspace
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Headspace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Headspace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at headspace.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.