HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Wellness360 · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Wellness360

26Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
9 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Employee wellbeing for enterprise buyers
Rank 21 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wellness360 for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience0%21 of 990%7under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wellness360 yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wellness360 across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative13 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained3 labels1
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative26 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Limited budget: Wellable or Wellness360 (starting ~$1/user/month)” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · first choice
“Wellness360 is a holistic corporate wellness platform built around the 8 pillars of wellness” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative
“ROI-focused analytics” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wellness360, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wellness360 was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wellable21 of 266Not in the top three
Personify Health20 of 266Not in the top three
CoreHealth15 of 262Not in the top three
Headspace15 of 260Not in the top three
Wellhub13 of 261Not in the top three
Unmind11 of 261Not in the top three
Vantage Fit10 of 261Not in the top three
Limeade9 of 262Not in the top three
Calm8 of 260Not in the top three
GoPivot7 of 260Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wellness360. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 26 answers that named Wellness360 and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com21
guideflow.com21
gopivotsolutions.com19
wellics.com16
hrtechsaas.com14
peoplemanagingpeople.com13
vantagefit.io10
deskbreak.app8
goodhabitz.com7
wellable.co7

136 of the 136 domain citations in answers naming Wellness360 came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wellness360's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wellness360, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wellness360.co is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack