Every category where a model named Vantage Fit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	6%	5 of 99	0%	16	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Vantage Fit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Vantage Fit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	3	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative12 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained11 labels5

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative31 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best For: Overall value and robust features at the lowest flat rate. * Estimated Price: $1 per user, per month.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice

“Wellbeats or Vantage Fit at roughly $1/employee/month offer the best cost-to-feature ratio” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice

“Vantage Fit or Avidon Health offer the best balance of features and affordability” Kimi K2 · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice

“Choose Vantage Fit or GoPivot if engagement, challenges, and participation are central.” Perplexity Sonar · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Vantage Fit, over the 31 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Vantage Fit was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wellable29 of 318Not in the top three

Personify Health17 of 316Not in the top three

Headspace16 of 310Not in the top three

Wellhub10 of 310Not in the top three

Wellness36010 of 310Not in the top three

Calm9 of 310Not in the top three

Unmind8 of 311Not in the top three

Limeade7 of 312Not in the top three

Woliba7 of 311Not in the top three

CoreHealth7 of 310Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Vantage Fit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 28 of the 31 answers that named Vantage Fit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com23

guideflow.com22

vantagefit.ioYour site19

peoplemanagingpeople.com17

avidonhealth.com16

gopivotsolutions.com14

deskbreak.app13

firsthr.app13

hrtechsaas.com12

wellable.co9

139 of the 158 domain citations in answers naming Vantage Fit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions23

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software18

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/employee-wellness-platforms15

deskbreak.app/workplace-wellness-programs/corporate-platforms13

firsthr.app/compare/performance/corporate-wellness-software13

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-wellness-software12

gopivotsolutions.com/best-corporate-wellness-platforms-202611

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-corporate-wellbeing-platforms11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Vantage Fit

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Vantage Fit; a claim can dispute any of them.

Vantage Circle / Vantage Fit 1Vantage Fit / MoveSpring 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Vantage Fit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Vantage Fit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at vantagefit.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.