Every category where a model named Woliba for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	22 of 99	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Woliba yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Woliba across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative6 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained5 labels2

Scale-constrained2 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Woliba leads as the top employee wellness platform by combining health challenges, peer-to-peer recognition, automated rewards, and pulse surveys into a single, modern platform.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · first choice

“Best For: Companies wanting to pay *only* for employees who actually participate.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative

“Woliba if you want an affordable, small-business-friendly platform” Perplexity Sonar · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative

“Wellness + recognition combo” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Woliba, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Woliba was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wellable13 of 187Not in the top three

YuMuuv11 of 183Not in the top three

Avidon Health8 of 182Not in the top three

Vantage Fit7 of 182Not in the top three

Headspace7 of 180Not in the top three

Calm5 of 180Not in the top three

Personify Health4 of 180Not in the top three

MoveSpring3 of 180Not in the top three

Sprout at Work3 of 180Not in the top three

Talkspace3 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Woliba. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 18 answers that named Woliba and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

vantagefit.io15

gartner.com13

avidonhealth.com11

peoplemanagingpeople.com10

guideflow.com8

keka.com7

spotsaas.com6

calmerry.com5

cxeverywhere.com5

firsthr.app5

Eighty-five of the eighty-five domain citations in answers naming Woliba came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions13

vantagefit.io/en/blog/employee-wellness-apps13

avidonhealth.com/hr-people-operations/best-wellness-platform-small-business10

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/employee-wellness-platforms10

avidonhealth.com/hr-people-operations/employee-wellness-programs-small-business7

keka.com/best-employee-wellness-software7

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-wellness-software6

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Woliba's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Woliba, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at woliba.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.