HR AI Index
Index Vendors › MoveSpring · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

MoveSpring

7Judge labels
0First choices
1Negative labels
5 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
3 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. MoveSpring was named 3 times in Employee wellbeing, where Wellable led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named MoveSpring for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience0%66 of 9933%3under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for MoveSpring yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated MoveSpring across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00101
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative6 labelsNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Platforms like *MoveSpring* are incredibly popular for step challenges, but they charge a hefty upfront setup/licensing fee” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as MoveSpring, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and MoveSpring was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Headspace7 of 70Not in the top three
Wellable6 of 72Not in the top three
Vantage Fit6 of 71Not in the top three
Calm6 of 70Not in the top three
Avidon Health4 of 72Not in the top three
YuMuuv4 of 71Not in the top three
Unmind4 of 70Not in the top three
Wellhub4 of 70Not in the top three
Personify Health3 of 71Not in the top three
CoreHealth3 of 70Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named MoveSpring. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 6 of the 7 answers that named MoveSpring and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com6
guideflow.com5
avidonhealth.com3
gopivotsolutions.com3
hrtechsaas.com3
lupahire.com3
nectarhr.com3
peoplemanagingpeople.com3
wellics.com3
championhealth.co.uk2

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming MoveSpring came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as MoveSpring

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as MoveSpring; a claim can dispute any of them.
Vantage Fit / MoveSpring 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when MoveSpring's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as MoveSpring, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at movespring.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack