Every category where a model named YuMuuv for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	9 of 99	0%	8	under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for YuMuuv yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated YuMuuv across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct8 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained14 labels4

Scale-constrained2 labels1

Negative2 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative33 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Avidon Health or YuMuuv both offer solid foundations starting around $2-3/month per employee” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice

“If you want high engagement through challenges: YuMuuv (around $2–3 PEPM) is a strong contender.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative

“Other options to consider are YuMuuv and Sprout at Work, which offer similar pricing and features.” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative

“Best For: Global teams, seasonal wellness initiatives, and lightweight challenges.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as YuMuuv, over the 33 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and YuMuuv was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wellable26 of 338Not in the top three

Avidon Health23 of 339Not in the top three

Headspace12 of 332Not in the top three

Sprout at Work12 of 330Not in the top three

Woliba11 of 332Not in the top three

Calm10 of 331Not in the top three

Personify Health8 of 330Not in the top three

Vantage Fit6 of 331Not in the top three

Wellbeats6 of 331Not in the top three

Burnalong4 of 330Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named YuMuuv. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 33 answers that named YuMuuv and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

avidonhealth.com24

gartner.com22

peoplemanagingpeople.com18

guideflow.com17

keka.com14

tophrsoftware.com14

vantagefit.io12

deskbreak.app8

firsthr.app8

g2.com7

144 of the 144 domain citations in answers naming YuMuuv came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

avidonhealth.com/hr-people-operations/best-wellness-platform-small-business23

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions22

avidonhealth.com/hr-people-operations/employee-wellness-programs-small-business17

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/employee-wellness-platforms17

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software16

keka.com/best-employee-wellness-software14

tophrsoftware.com/tools/best-employee-wellness-software14

vantagefit.io/en/blog/employee-wellness-apps12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when YuMuuv's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as YuMuuv, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at yumuuv.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.