HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Wellbeats · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

Wellbeats

13Judge labels
3First choices
0Negative labels
7 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
6 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Wellbeats was named 6 times in Employee wellbeing, where Wellable led with 30%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Wellbeats for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience4%7 of 990%6under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wellbeats yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wellbeats across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast10001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash10001
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative0 labelsNone
Budget-constrained12 labels3
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative13 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Wellbeats or Vantage Fit at roughly $1/employee/month offer the best cost-to-feature ratio” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice
“Start here: Wellbeats for the absolute lowest cost and simplicity.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · first choice
“Sprout at Work, Wellbeats, or Wellable Lite are recommended for small budgets.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative
“For purely fitness-focused wellness, Wellbeats is unbeatable on price.” Kimi K2 · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wellbeats, over the 13 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wellbeats was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wellable11 of 133Not in the top three
Sprout at Work9 of 130Not in the top three
Vantage Fit7 of 132Not in the top three
Avidon Health6 of 133Not in the top three
YuMuuv6 of 131Not in the top three
Headspace5 of 131Not in the top three
Calm5 of 130Not in the top three
Burnalong3 of 130Not in the top three
WellSteps2 of 131Not in the top three
Personify Health2 of 130Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wellbeats. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 13 of the 13 answers that named Wellbeats and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

deskbreak.app13
avidonhealth.com12
gartner.com10
peoplemanagingpeople.com10
tophrsoftware.com9
vantagefit.io9
guideflow.com8
firsthr.app7
keka.com6
nectarhr.com5

Eighty-nine of the eighty-nine domain citations in answers naming Wellbeats came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wellbeats

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wellbeats; a claim can dispute any of them.
Wellbeats (by Wellable) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wellbeats's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wellbeats, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wellbeats.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack