HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Sprout at Work · September 2026 Edition
Sprout · 1 category · Ranked

Sprout at Work

22Judge labels
1First choices
1Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
3% in Employee wellbeing for small business buyers
Rank 20 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Sprout at Work for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience0%20 of 990%8under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Sprout at Work yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Sprout at Work across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01001
Grok 4.1 Fast01001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick01102
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct4 labelsNone
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained11 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative1 labelNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative22 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Other options to consider are YuMuuv and Sprout at Work, which offer similar pricing and features.” Llama 4 Maverick · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative
“Specifically geared toward small teams (under 20 employees). Simple, low-cost option.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative
“If your primary focus is team challenges and gamification, consider Sprout.” Kimi K2 · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · alternative
“Sprout at Work, Wellbeats, or Wellable Lite are recommended for small budgets.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Sprout at Work, over the 22 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Sprout at Work was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Wellable20 of 227Not in the top three
YuMuuv12 of 221Not in the top three
Avidon Health10 of 227Not in the top three
Wellbeats9 of 221Not in the top three
Headspace8 of 221Not in the top three
Vantage Fit7 of 222Not in the top three
Burnalong5 of 220Not in the top three
Limeade5 of 220Not in the top three
Personify Health5 of 220Not in the top three
Wellness3604 of 220Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Sprout at Work. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 22 of the 22 answers that named Sprout at Work and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

avidonhealth.com18
gartner.com17
peoplemanagingpeople.com15
guideflow.com14
deskbreak.app11
firsthr.app11
tophrsoftware.com8
vantagefit.io8
keka.com7
nectarhr.com6

115 of the 115 domain citations in answers naming Sprout at Work came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Sprout at Work

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Sprout at Work; a claim can dispute any of them.
Sprout 3
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Sprout at Work's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Sprout at Work, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sprout.ph is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack