Every category where a model named Limeade for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	19 of 99	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	43 of 77	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Limeade yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Limeade across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	2	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative13 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative28 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Unique for combining *employee listening (surveys/EX analytics)* with wellbeing in one platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Choose Limeade if you care most about employee engagement and culture” Perplexity Sonar · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · alternative

“Excellent for companies focused heavily on culture and retention.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · alternative

“Limeade: Strong on engagement and science-backed approach” Kimi K2 · Employee wellbeing · scale prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Limeade, over the 28 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Limeade was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wellable23 of 289Not in the top three

Personify Health21 of 282Not in the top three

Headspace15 of 281Not in the top three

Wellhub12 of 280Not in the top three

Wellness3609 of 281Not in the top three

Calm7 of 281Not in the top three

Unmind7 of 281Not in the top three

Vantage Fit7 of 281Not in the top three

CoreHealth7 of 280Not in the top three

Navigate Wellbeing6 of 280Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Limeade. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 24 of the 28 answers that named Limeade and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com19

hrtechsaas.com19

gartner.com17

gopivotsolutions.com16

deskbreak.app11

peoplemanagingpeople.com11

firsthr.app10

vantagefit.io10

avidonhealth.com9

wellics.com8

130 of the 130 domain citations in answers naming Limeade came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-corporate-wellbeing-platforms19

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software18

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions17

gopivotsolutions.com/best-corporate-wellness-platforms-202612

deskbreak.app/workplace-wellness-programs/corporate-platforms11

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/employee-wellness-platforms10

firsthr.app/compare/performance/corporate-wellness-software9

gopivotsolutions.com/how-to-choose-the-right-corporate-wellness-platform-a-comparison-of-l8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Limeade

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Limeade; a claim can dispute any of them.

Limeade (now under WebMD Health Services) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Limeade's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Limeade, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at limeade.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.