HR AI Index
Index › Vendors › CoreHealth · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

CoreHealth

25Judge labels
4First choices
2Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
10% in Employee wellbeing for enterprise buyers
Rank 34 of 99 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 3 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business66 of 78
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market34 of 99
0%3 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise5 of 66
10%20 labels
accepted challenger
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named CoreHealth for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience0%34 of 990%3under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CoreHealth yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CoreHealth across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00101
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200101
GLM 4.7 FlashX00101
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct6 labels2
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative11 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels2
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative25 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CoreHealth, over the 25 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CoreHealth was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Personify Health21 of 2510Not in the top three
Wellable19 of 254Not in the top three
Wellness36015 of 250Not in the top three
Wellhub13 of 251Not in the top three
Headspace13 of 250Not in the top three
Unmind9 of 251Not in the top three
Limeade7 of 252Not in the top three
Vantage Fit7 of 250Not in the top three
Calm6 of 250Not in the top three
Spring Health6 of 250Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CoreHealth. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 25 answers that named CoreHealth and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com24
gartner.com19
gopivotsolutions.com17
hrtechsaas.com12
peoplemanagingpeople.com12
wellics.com10
deskbreak.app8
lupahire.com8
avidonhealth.com7
goodhabitz.com7

124 of the 124 domain citations in answers naming CoreHealth came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software23
gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions19
gopivotsolutions.com/best-corporate-wellness-platforms-202615
guideflow.com/blog/corporate-wellness-software15
hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-corporate-wellbeing-platforms11
peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/employee-wellness-platforms11
wellics.com/blog/top-12-corporate-wellbeing-platforms-2024-buyers-guide-with-pricing10
deskbreak.app/workplace-wellness-programs/corporate-platforms8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CoreHealth's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CoreHealth, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at corehealth.global is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack