HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Spring Health · September 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

Spring Health

35Judge labels
14First choices
3Negative labels
8 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
16% in Employee wellbeing for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 99 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In employee wellbeing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Spring Health for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental healthOnboarding and employee experience16%2 of 990%14accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Spring Health yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Spring Health across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash11103
Perplexity Sonar10001
Grok 4.1 Fast10102
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash11103
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K211002
GLM 4.7 FlashX10001
MiniMax M2.510001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labels1
Paraphrase16 labels13
Comparative6 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative35 labels in all, every segment counted; 14 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with a modern digital EAP platform (examples: Spring Health, Lyra, Headspace for Business, Unmind)” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“combined with a dedicated therapy platform (like Lyra Health or Spring Health) for a mid-sized B2B company” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Examples include providers like Modern Health, Lyra Health, Ginger, or Spring Health.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“a modern integrated mental health platform (Modern Health or Spring Health) is my top recommendation” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Spring Health, over the 35 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Spring Health was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Headspace18 of 350Not in the top three
Modern Health16 of 350Not in the top three
Personify Health15 of 352Not in the top three
Wellhub11 of 351Not in the top three
Calm9 of 350Not in the top three
GoPivot6 of 352Not in the top three
CoreHealth6 of 351Not in the top three
Unmind5 of 350Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Spring Health. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 35 answers that named Spring Health and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

deskbreak.app13
hrtechsaas.com13
gartner.com12
calmerry.com11
guideflow.com11
vantagefit.io10
gopivotsolutions.com9
treegarden.io9
peoplemanagingpeople.com8
rewordin.com8

104 of the 104 domain citations in answers naming Spring Health came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Spring Health's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Spring Health, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at springhealth.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack