Every category where a model named Lyra Health for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	10%	3 of 99	8%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Lyra Health yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Lyra Health across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	0	0	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	2	0	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labels1

Paraphrase16 labels10

Comparative7 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative34 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 13 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd recommend implementing an Employee Assistance Program (EAP) combined with a dedicated therapy platform (like Lyra Health or Spring Health)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Choose a platform with your team size in mind (Lyra/Spring Health for large mid-market, Calmerry for smaller teams)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Examples include providers like Modern Health, Lyra Health, Ginger, or Spring Health.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Digital EAP + therapy platform (like Lyra, Spring Health, Unmind)” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“While Lyra Health is another major leader in this space, it is often priced and structured for large enterprises” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Lyra Health, over the 34 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Lyra Health was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Spring Health28 of 343Compare →

Wellable17 of 341Compare →

Personify Health16 of 345Not in the top three

Modern Health15 of 342Not in the top three

Headspace15 of 341Not in the top three

Wellhub12 of 342Not in the top three

Calm7 of 340Not in the top three

Unmind6 of 340Not in the top three

GoPivot5 of 341Not in the top three

CoreHealth4 of 341Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Lyra Health. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 34 answers that named Lyra Health and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

deskbreak.app14

hrtechsaas.com12

calmerry.com11

gartner.com11

guideflow.com11

gopivotsolutions.com10

rewordin.com10

vantagefit.io10

shrm.org9

treegarden.io9

107 of the 107 domain citations in answers naming Lyra Health came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions11

calmerry.com/blog/workplace-wellbeing/best-mental-health-platforms-for-companies10

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software10

rewordin.com/blog/best-employee-wellness-platforms-202610

gopivotsolutions.com/best-corporate-wellness-platforms-20269

treegarden.io/blog/mental-health-benefits-guide-us9

deskbreak.app/workplace-wellness-programs/mental-health8

shrm.org/enterprise-solutions/insights/advanced-mental-health-benefits-at-work-guide8

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Lyra Health

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Lyra Health; a claim can dispute any of them.

Lyra 3

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Lyra Health's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Lyra Health, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at lyrahealth.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.