Every category where a model named Unmind for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	2%	10 of 99	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by Wellable at 30%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Unmind yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Unmind across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labels1

Paraphrase2 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative20 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose Unmind if you have a high-stress environment and need serious psychological safety resources.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · first choice

“Deep clinical mental health... Best for large enterprises looking to *replace or augment an EAP*. Premium pricing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Unmind provides access to licensed therapists and coaches specializing in 50+ areas of mental wellbeing” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

“(examples: Spring Health, Lyra, Headspace for Business, Unmind) at roughly $150\u2013$200/employee” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee wellbeing · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Unmind, over the 20 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Unmind was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Headspace17 of 201Not in the top three

Wellable15 of 203Not in the top three

Personify Health14 of 206Not in the top three

Wellhub11 of 200Not in the top three

Wellness36011 of 200Not in the top three

Calm9 of 200Not in the top three

CoreHealth9 of 200Not in the top three

GoPivot8 of 200Not in the top three

Vantage Fit8 of 200Not in the top three

Limeade7 of 202Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Unmind. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 19 of the 20 answers that named Unmind and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com16

gopivotsolutions.com14

gartner.com11

hrtechsaas.com10

wellics.com10

championhealth.co.uk8

deskbreak.app8

vantagefit.io8

lupahire.com6

peoplemanagingpeople.com6

Ninety-seven of the ninety-seven domain citations in answers naming Unmind came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software16

gopivotsolutions.com/best-corporate-wellness-platforms-202612

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions11

wellics.com/blog/top-12-corporate-wellbeing-platforms-2024-buyers-guide-with-pricing10

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-corporate-wellbeing-platforms9

deskbreak.app/workplace-wellness-programs/corporate-platforms8

gopivotsolutions.com/how-to-choose-the-right-corporate-wellness-platform-a-comparison-of-l6

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-wellness-software6

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Unmind's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Unmind, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at unmind.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.