Every category where a model named Wellhub for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Employee wellbeing and mental health	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	18 of 99	0%	12	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Wellhub yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Wellhub across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels3

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative25 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative42 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The clear leader here... Best if your priority is *physical fitness and gym access*. Note: lighter on admin/clinical tools.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

“if your priority is fitness access or clinical mental health specifically, consider Wellhub or Lyra Health” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee wellbeing · direct prompt · alternative

“Choose Wellhub if your main benefit is access to gyms and studios.” Perplexity Sonar · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

“Fitness priority: Wellhub (best gym network)” MiniMax M2.5 · Employee wellbeing · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Wellhub, over the 42 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Wellhub was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Wellable35 of 429Not in the top three

Personify Health28 of 428Not in the top three

Headspace26 of 422Not in the top three

Calm13 of 421Not in the top three

Wellness36013 of 421Not in the top three

CoreHealth13 of 420Not in the top three

Limeade12 of 422Not in the top three

Lyra Health12 of 422Not in the top three

GoPivot11 of 421Not in the top three

Spring Health11 of 421Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Wellhub. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 36 of the 42 answers that named Wellhub and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com24

gopivotsolutions.com24

guideflow.com20

hrtechsaas.com20

peoplemanagingpeople.com14

g2.com13

vantagefit.io13

wellics.com13

rewordin.com11

avidonhealth.com10

162 of the 162 domain citations in answers naming Wellhub came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/employee-well-being-solutions24

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-corporate-wellbeing-platforms20

gopivotsolutions.com/best-corporate-wellness-platforms-202619

guideflow.com/blog/employee-wellbeing-software19

wellics.com/blog/top-12-corporate-wellbeing-platforms-2024-buyers-guide-with-pricing13

gopivotsolutions.com/how-to-choose-the-right-corporate-wellness-platform-a-comparison-of-l12

guideflow.com/blog/corporate-wellness-software12

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/employee-wellness-platforms11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Wellhub

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Wellhub; a claim can dispute any of them.

Wellhub (formerly Gympass) 5

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Wellhub's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Wellhub, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at wellhub.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.