Every category where a model named Continu for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	4%	7 of 80	0%	9	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%
Learning management systems	Learning and development	2%	9 of 74	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by TalentLMS at 48%
Course authoring tools	Learning and development	0%	50 of 86	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Articulate 360 at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Continu yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Continu across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	2	0	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1	0	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels3

Paraphrase4 labels2

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained1 label1

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Continu offers an optimal balance of robust functionality, intuitive user experience, and implementation flexibility, making it a top recommendation” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning management syst · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Learn Amp and Continu are specifically highlighted as strong options for mid-market companies.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Look at agile, mid-market-focused platforms like 360Learning, Learn Amp, Continu, or Absorb.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · scale prompt · first choice

“Choose Docebo or Continu if you are an enterprise seeking AI-driven personalization and scalability.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning management syst · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Continu, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Continu was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo28 of 374Not in the top three

360Learning24 of 375Not in the top three

Absorb LMS23 of 371Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand20 of 372Not in the top three

Degreed12 of 375Not in the top three

TalentLMS12 of 374Not in the top three

Learn Amp12 of 372Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning9 of 370Not in the top three

LearnUpon8 of 370Not in the top three

Sana Learn6 of 371Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Continu. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 33 of the 37 answers that named Continu and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

continu.comYour site16

goskills.com16

docebo.com14

peoplemanagingpeople.com14

360learning.com12

digitalhumans.com11

g2.com10

cloudshare.com9

ispring.com9

absorbai.com8

103 of the 119 domain citations in answers naming Continu came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms15

continu.com/software/best-learning-management-system12

360learning.com/blog/learning-experience-platforms11

digitalhumans.com/blog/the-10-best-learning-experience-platforms-lxp-reviewed-for-202611

cloudshare.com/blog/best-learning-experience-platforms9

ispring.com/knowledge-hub/learning-experience-platforms8

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-learning-experience-platform8

docebo.com/learning-network/blog/best-learning-management-system7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Continu's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Continu, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at continu.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.