HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Diligent / Compliance Wave · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Diligent / Compliance Wave

7Judge labels

0First choices

0Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Diligent / Compliance Wave was named 4 times in Compliance training, where Traliant led with 22%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market25 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise31 of 84

under the label threshold

In compliance training · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Diligent / Compliance Wave for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Compliance training	Learning and development	0%	25 of 80	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by Traliant at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Diligent / Compliance Wave yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Diligent / Compliance Wave across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Diligent / Compliance Wave, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Diligent / Compliance Wave was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Traliant7 of 70Not in the top three

NAVEX6 of 71Not in the top three

Rethink Compliance6 of 70Not in the top three

Ethena5 of 70Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand4 of 70Not in the top three

EasyLlama4 of 70Not in the top three

Emtrain4 of 70Not in the top three

Everfi4 of 70Not in the top three

Absorb LMS3 of 70Not in the top three

Content Enablers3 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Diligent / Compliance Wave. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 7 answers that named Diligent / Compliance Wave and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

bizlibrary.com7

emtrain.com5

coggno.com3

compliquest.com3

expertinsights.com3

hrtechsaas.com3

theprimevr.com3

traliant.com3

gitnux.org2

smartdatacollective.com2

Thirty-four of the thirty-four domain citations in answers naming Diligent / Compliance Wave came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

bizlibrary.com/blog/training-programs/top-10-compliance-training-content-providers7

emtrain.com/blog/ethics-and-compliance/the-best-compliance-training-vendors-in-2026-compar5

compliquest.com/en/blog/best-compliance-training-platforms-compared-20263

expertinsights.com/compliance/top-compliance-training-solutions3

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-compliance-training-platforms3

theprimevr.com/blog/best-compliance-training-companies3

traliant.com/blog/top-10-compliance-training-providers3

coggno.com/blog/best-enterprise-compliance-training-companies-for-highly-regulated-industr2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Diligent / Compliance Wave

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Diligent / Compliance Wave; a claim can dispute any of them.

Diligent/Compliance Wave 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Diligent / Compliance Wave's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Diligent / Compliance Wave, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at diligent.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.