Index › Vendors › EdCast · September 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

EdCast

18Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

7 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

8 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. EdCast was named 8 times in Learning experience plat, where Learn Amp led with 28%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business37 of 65

under the label threshold

Mid-market25 of 80

under the label threshold

Enterprise21 of 61

under the label threshold

In learning experience plat · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named EdCast for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	0%	25 of 80	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by Learn Amp at 28%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for EdCast yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated EdCast across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1	0	2
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative5 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“making it the premier choice for companies deeply integrated into the SAP ecosystem” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Learning experience plat · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“some features feel "half-developed" or misaligned with standard software usability guidelines” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

“Acquired by Cornerstone in 2022; being absorbed into the larger Galaxy suite.” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as EdCast, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and EdCast was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Degreed14 of 183Not in the top three

360Learning14 of 181Not in the top three

Docebo14 of 180Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand7 of 180Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning7 of 180Not in the top three

Absorb LMS6 of 181Not in the top three

GoSkills4 of 182Not in the top three

Sana Learn3 of 181Not in the top three

Udemy Business3 of 181Not in the top three

LearnUpon3 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named EdCast. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 18 answers that named EdCast and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com8

ispring.com6

docebo.com5

skillscaravan.com5

360learning.com3

absorbai.com3

elearningindustry.com3

sanalabs.com3

skillq.com3

upscend.com3

No domain is on file for EdCast, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms7

ispring.com/knowledge-hub/learning-experience-platforms5

absorbai.com/blog/best-learning-experience-platforms3

skillq.com/lxp3

360learning.com/blog/lxp-features2

5mins.ai/resources/blog/a-comprehensive-guide-to-learning-experiene-platforms2

blog.neuralminds.io/chro-guide-ai-lxp-procurement-enterprise2

cloudeagle.ai/blogs/saas-procurement-guide2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as EdCast

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as EdCast; a claim can dispute any of them.

EdCast (Cornerstone LXP) 1EdCast (SAP SuccessFactors) 1EdCast (now part of Cornerstone) 1EdCast by Cornerstone 1Edcast 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when EdCast's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as EdCast, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at the vendor's own domain is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.