HR AI Index

Index › Products › Ethicontrol · October 2026 Edition

1 category · Named, not ranked

Ethicontrol

8Judge labels

2First choices

1Negative labels

6 / 14Models named it

1Category

October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.7, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Ethicontrol was named 3 times in Whistleblowing, where FaceUp led with 25%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business14 of 79

under the label threshold

Mid-market16 of 107

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In whistleblowing · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Ethicontrol for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Whistleblowing and investigations	Core HR and payroll	2%	16 of 107	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by FaceUp at 25%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Ethicontrol yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Ethicontrol across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase1 label1

Comparative1 label1not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best budget pick: Ethicontrol Starter—if you want a hosted system that includes both whistleblower intake and case management.” GPT-6 Luna · Whistleblowing · budget prompt · first choice

“Best for SMEs with Multi-Channel Intake” Kimi K2 · Whistleblowing · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Ethicontrol, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Ethicontrol was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

FaceUp6 of 82Not among the top eight

Whistlelink5 of 82Not among the top eight

Whistleblower Software3 of 82Not among the top eight

NAVEX One3 of 80Not among the top eight

AllVoices2 of 80Not among the top eight

EthicsPoint2 of 80Not among the top eight

GlobaLeaks2 of 80Not among the top eight

Walor2 of 80Not among the top eight

Trusty1 of 81Not among the top eight

Case IQ1 of 80Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Ethicontrol. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 8 of the 8 answers that named Ethicontrol and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

navex.com6

getapp.com5

faceup.com4

g2.com4

whistlelink.com4

ethicontrol.comYour site3

firsthr.app3

omr.com3

softwareadvice.com3

gartner.com2

Thirty-four of the thirty-seven domain citations in answers naming Ethicontrol came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getapp.com/hr-employee-management-software/whistleblowing/org/mid-size-business4

navex.com/en-us/platform/whistleblowing-software-solutions4

navex.com/en-us/small-business/ethicspoint4

ethicontrol.com/en-us/pricing3

faceup.com/en/blog/best-whistleblowing-software-tools3

firsthr.app/compare/general/whistleblower-platform3

g2.com/categories/whistleblowing3

whistlelink.com/en-us/pricing3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ethicontrol.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Ethicontrol takes 2% of first choices and FaceUp takes 25%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platform”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “whistleblowing and investigation platforms”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 10 a month (“ethicontrol”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 126 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 86 · 6 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 484
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 16 of 107 in whistleblowing

Segment leader

25%

FaceUp

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 8 answers
Its own site cited: in 8 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on ethicontrol.com

534

subdomains included

Content

358

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

10 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest
Blog	338	8	2026-09-24
Conference or event	9	0	2026-05-28
Webinar or virtual event	5	undated
Comparison	4	0	2024-07-27
Template or tool	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-24Integrity ambassadors 2.0 blog
2026-09-24Integrity ambassadors 2.0 uk blog
2026-09-17Acfe report to the nations 2026 blog
2026-09-09Dokazy zamist intuitsii sb club blog
2026-09-09How multilingual reporting systems protect whistleblowers blog
2026-08-06Internal reporting software for eu mid sized firms blog

Events in person

Last twelve months

May 27, 2026Integrity MattersКиїв, Україна · sponsored
May 27, 2026Integrity MattersKyiv, Ukraine · sponsored

As the event pages on ethicontrol.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ethicontrol.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Ethicontrol

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Ethicontrol; a claim can dispute any of them.

Ethicontrol Starter 1

Follow Ethicontrol

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Ethicontrol is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Next generation whistleblowing platform
ethicontrol.com
For: Trusted by enterprises and affordable for startups
ethicontrol.com
Price stated: from 89 EUR per month ethicontrol.com
Starting price: 89 EUR per month ethicontrol.com
Free plan or trial: Regardless of a tariff plan – gain test access to all features for the first 6 months. ethicontrol.com
Certifications: ISO 27701ISO 27001ISO 27001 Information security certifiedISO 27701 Privacy management certifiedISO 27001 Information Security Management SystemISO 27701 Privacy management system
Hosting: EUGermanyEU countriesUSUAEKSAIndiaTanzania
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations, customers

What Ethicontrol's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: ethicontrol.com, ethicontrol.com/en/pricing, ethicontrol.com/en/features/case-management, ethicontrol.com/en/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Ethicontrol's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Ethicontrol, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Ethicontrol by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Ethicontrol is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Ethicontrol, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.