1 category · RankedGlobaLeaks
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Whistleblowing and investigations | Core HR and payroll | 6% | 5 of 107 | 11% | 18 | accepted challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated GlobaLeaks across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“open-source tools with strong anonymity design are generally favored... with GlobaLeaks and SecureDrop repeatedly identified as purpose-built options” Perplexity Sonar · Whistleblowing · negative prompt · first choice
“## 1 🥇 GlobaLeaks – Free, self‑hosted, open‑source ... Best for: Companies with some IT expertise who want zero monthly cost” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Whistleblowing · budget prompt · first choice
“GlobaLeaks is an open-source, self-hosted whistleblowing initiative... Audited Open Source No account Self-hosted Tor Free” Muse Glimmer 30B · Whistleblowing · negative prompt · first choice
“SecureDrop/GlobaLeaks: Used by news orgs (e.g., NYT, Guardian); Tor-based, open-source, no central logs.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Whistleblowing · negative prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“While robust open-source platforms like SecureDrop and GlobaLeaks are highly secure, they rely on Tor network `.onion` addresses.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Whistleblowing · negative prompt · soft negative
“GlobaLeaks is an option, but it comes with added complexity.” Mistral Small · Whistleblowing · budget prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as GlobaLeaks, over the 26 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and GlobaLeaks was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 25 of the 26 answers that named GlobaLeaks and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
Ninety-eight of the 106 domain citations in answers naming GlobaLeaks came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
globaleaks.org is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, GlobaLeaks takes 6% of first choices and FaceUp takes 25%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 70 a month (“globaleaks”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 2 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 33 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 26 · 1 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,798
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 3 across its categories
- Named in
- 26 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 25 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2021-11-19 | ||
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 1 | 0 | 2024-11-05 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2024-11-05Integrity at work week online conference 2024 beyond borders fresh perspectives on whistleblowing and workplace integrit webinar or virtual event
- 2021-11-19Workshop building secure whistleblowing platforms with globaleaks free software conference or event
- 2021-04-04Workshop building secure whistleblowing systems for anticorruption with the globaleaks software conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page globaleaks.org exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
Names read as GlobaLeaks
Follow GlobaLeaks
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
GlobaLeaks is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- free, open source software enabling anyone to easily set up and maintain a secure whistleblowing platform
- For
- anyone
- Free plan or trial
- Online Demo globaleaks.org
- Certifications
- Standard ISO 37002EU Directive 2019/1937General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)ISO/IEC 27001:2022Directive (EU) 2019/882WCAG 2.2ISO 27001:2022CSA STAR
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting, customers
What GlobaLeaks's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: globaleaks.org, globaleaks.org/features/security, globaleaks.org/features. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when GlobaLeaks's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as GlobaLeaks, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for GlobaLeaks by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where GlobaLeaks is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name GlobaLeaks, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.