HR AI Index
Index Vendors › Google Forms · September 2026 Edition
4 categories · Ranked

Google Forms

48Judge labels
0First choices
24Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
4Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
0% in Employee engagement surv for small business buyers
Rank 24 of 77 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 38% of its 8 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In employee engagement surv · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Google Forms for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Employee engagement surveysOnboarding and employee experience0%24 of 7738%8under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%
360 feedbackPerformance and talent management0%77 of 7786%7under 10 labels · led by Lattice at 40%
Candidate assessmentTalent acquisition0%69 of 1010%1under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%
Internal talent marketplacePerformance and talent management0%47 of 1290%1under 10 labels · led by Fuel50 at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Google Forms yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Google Forms across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00033
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00123
Kimi K201012
GLM 4.7 FlashX02002
MiniMax M2.500101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained24 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative13 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative48 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Easiest zero-cost start if you're in Google Workspace... For <10 people, go FeedbackPulse/Google Forms free.” Grok 4.1 Fast · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · alternative
“Google Forms is free and flexible if you're willing to build templates and analysis yourself” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · alternative
“keep costs to zero and are comfortable building surveys yourself: Choose Google Forms” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · alternative
“Truly zero budget and have tech skills? → Google Forms + Sheets for DIY surveys” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Employee engagement surv · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Generic survey platforms that "wear a 360 badge" (e.g., SurveyMonkey, Google Forms, generic form tools)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · 360 feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“Generic Survey Tools (JotForm, Google Forms, basic templates) Why avoid:” Kimi K2 · 360 feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid: "DIY" or Ad-Hoc Survey Tools (e.g., Basic Google Forms, SurveyMonkey)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · 360 feedback · negative prompt · hard negative
“AVOID: Microsoft Forms, Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, Tally.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · 360 feedback · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Google Forms, over the 48 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Google Forms was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
SurveyMonkey26 of 480Not in the top three
FeedbackPulse23 of 4811Not in the top three
Culture Amp20 of 482Not in the top three
Workleap Officevibe19 of 488Not in the top three
Lattice18 of 480Not in the top three
15Five16 of 480Not in the top three
Spidergap11 of 481Not in the top three
ThriveSparrow10 of 486Not in the top three
Jotform8 of 480Not in the top three
Typeform8 of 480Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Google Forms. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 48 answers that named Google Forms and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

feedbackpulse.com30
selectsoftwarereviews.com20
engagedly.com15
thrivesparrow.com15
peoplemanagingpeople.com14
workhuman.com13
firsthr.app11
betterworks.com10
nanoglobals.com10
qualaroo.com10

148 of the 148 domain citations in answers naming Google Forms came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Forms's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Forms, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at google.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack