HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Facebook Groups · September 2026 Edition

Facebook · 2 categories · Named, not ranked

Facebook Groups

6Judge labels

0First choices

4Negative labels

4 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

3 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Facebook Groups was named 3 times in Job advertising and 1 other category, where JobTarget led with 21%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business47 of 94

under the label threshold

Mid-market100 of 109

under the label threshold

Enterprisenot named

No model named it for this buyer.

In job advertising · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Facebook Groups for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	100 of 109	100%	2	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Employee engagement surveys	Onboarding and employee experience	0%	54 of 77	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Culture Amp at 40%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Facebook Groups yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Facebook Groups across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative6 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Unregulated Classified and Social Media Sites (Craigslist, Facebook Groups)... virtually no employer vetting” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

“generic job groups are filled with bot accounts and affiliate marketers trying to sell courses” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Job advertising · negative prompt · hard negative

“can be fine for conversation but are often weak for owned, structured community building” Perplexity Sonar · Employee engagement surv · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Facebook Groups, over the 6 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Facebook Groups was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Craigslist3 of 60Not in the top three

Indeed3 of 60Not in the top three

LinkedIn3 of 60Not in the top three

Monster3 of 60Not in the top three

CareerBuilder2 of 60Not in the top three

Discord2 of 60Not in the top three

Fiverr2 of 60Not in the top three

Google for Jobs2 of 60Not in the top three

Slack2 of 60Not in the top three

Upwork2 of 60Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Facebook Groups. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 6 answers that named Facebook Groups and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com2

1840andco.com1

a.team1

agilityportal.io1

appcues.com1

befriend.cc1

bitdefender.com1

blog.hypeauditor.com1

brightlocal.com1

businessage.com1

Eleven of the eleven domain citations in answers naming Facebook Groups came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

1840andco.com/blog/upwork-alternatives1

a.team/talent/guides/marketplaces-vs-agencies-vs-staffing-firms1

agilityportal.io/blog/employee-engagement-platforms-for-businesses1

appcues.com/blog/user-engagement-tools1

befriend.cc/hi/2026/02/03/teen-chat-app-safety-20261

bitdefender.com/en-us/blog/hotforsecurity/instagram-paid-follower-scam1

blog.hypeauditor.com/25-best-influencer-vetting-tools-to-avoid-fake-engagement-bad-collabs1

brightlocal.com/learn/review-platform-guidelines1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Facebook Groups's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Facebook Groups, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at facebook.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.