Every category where a model named Fiverr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	4%	7 of 97	25%	16	criticized challenger
Internal talent marketplace	Performance and talent management	0%	79 of 129	42%	19	criticized challenger
Job advertising and distribution	Talent acquisition	0%	58 of 109	25%	4	under 10 labels · led by JobTarget at 21%
Compensation management	Compensation and total rewards	0%	157 of 189	67%	3	under 10 labels · led by Pave at 18%
Skills intelligence	Performance and talent management	0%	158 of 162	100%	3	under 10 labels · led by TalentGuard at 19%
Coaching platforms	Learning and development	0%	99 of 116	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Growthspace at 26%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Fiverr yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Fiverr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	2	4	6
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	2	5
Mistral Small	1	1	0	1	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	3	2	7
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	3	2	2	7
Kimi K2	0	0	2	2	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	2	4	7

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase20 labels3

Comparative33 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative59 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative114 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I would recommend Fiverr Enterprise as a freelancer management platform for a mid-sized B2B company.” Llama 4 Maverick · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Fiverr = quick, fixed‑price gigs → best for micro‑tasks and prototypes.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal talent marketpl · comparative prompt · first choice

“Fiverr Enterprise or Deel are often the best recommendations” Mistral Small · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“established marketplaces like Upwork, Fiverr, Toptal, Malt, and Contra generally have escrow-based payments and lower scam risk” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Internal talent marketpl · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Marketplaces Without Vetting (Fiverr, Upwork, Craigslist) ... using them for high-stakes life or business coaching is risky.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Coaching platforms · negative prompt · hard negative

“Fiverr - Among lowest scorers” MiniMax M2.5 · Compensation management · negative prompt · hard negative

“Rather than standard hiring marketplaces like Upwork or Fiverr, you need a dedicated Freelancer Management System (FMS)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

“MODERATE-HIGH RISK: Platforms with Significant Complaints ... Freelance Marketplaces (Upwork, Fiverr, Freelancer.com)” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Fiverr, over the 111 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Fiverr was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Upwork104 of 11111Not in the top three

Toptal54 of 11111Not in the top three

Freelancer.com53 of 1110Not in the top three

Deel26 of 1119Not in the top three

PeoplePerHour25 of 1111Not in the top three

Worksuite24 of 1115Not in the top three

Contra20 of 1110Not in the top three

Beeline19 of 1111Not in the top three

SAP Fieldglass18 of 1111Not in the top three

Remote17 of 1112Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Fiverr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 91 of the 111 answers that named Fiverr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com39

upwork.com31

talentdesk.io24

awesomic.com23

reddit.com23

worldmetrics.org23

peoplemanagingpeople.com22

learn.g2.com19

linkedin.com19

trustpilot.com19

242 of the 242 domain citations in answers naming Fiverr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-freelancer-management-systems17

cbr.exchange/blogs/how-to-choose-a-talent-marketplace-key-criteria-for-202615

cotocus.com/blog/top-10-workforce-marketplace-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison14

scale.jobs/blog/freelance-platforms-b2b-services-comparison14

awesomic.com/blog/ultimate-list-talent-marketplaces-for-businesses-in-202513

guideflow.com/blog/freelancer-management-system13

g2.com/categories/freelance-platforms/small-business12

outsourceaccelerator.com/articles/upwork-and-fiverr-scams-and-how-to-avoid-them12

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Fiverr

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Fiverr; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fiverr Enterprise 7Fiverr / Fiverr Pro 1Upwork Enterprise / Fiverr Enterprise 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Fiverr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Fiverr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fiverr.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.