Every category where a model named Beeline for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	12 of 97	32%	40	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Beeline yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Beeline across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	1	0	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	2	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	4	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	3	1	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	2	2	5
Mistral Small	0	2	1	1	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	3	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct30 labels3

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative32 labels5not counted in share

Budget-constrained26 labels7

Scale-constrained16 labels2

Negative17 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative121 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I recommend evaluating Beeline Professional first, as it's explicitly marketed for mid-market affordability” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · first choice

“Prefer highly rated VMS/MSPs like SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, or Magnit” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · first choice

“Best For: Organizations that want a VMS-first solution with deep supplier relationship management capabilities.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative

“If you need more advanced features and can negotiate based on spend, Beeline is also worth considering.” Mistral Small · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise options like SAP Fieldglass or Beeline are not recommended for limited budgets” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative

“Better for large global programs; higher cost structure prices out most mid-market buyers” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · hard negative

“Avoid legacy enterprise VMS platforms like SAP Fieldglass, Beeline” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid ... Transaction-based fees ($25–$75/worker/month)” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Beeline, over the 120 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beeline was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Fieldglass115 of 12018Not in the top three

Magnit62 of 1209Not in the top three

Workday VNDLY50 of 1202Not in the top three

VectorVMS39 of 1200Not in the top three

SimpleVMS35 of 12019Not in the top three

Worksuite34 of 1204Not in the top three

SimplifyVMS34 of 1202Not in the top three

Coupa Contingent Workforce32 of 1200Not in the top three

Deel31 of 1205Not in the top three

TalentDesk.io28 of 1206Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Beeline. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 104 of the 120 answers that named Beeline and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrtechsaas.com72

talentdesk.io69

worldmetrics.org49

bestrecruitingtools.com46

aihratlas.com41

peoplemanagingpeople.com39

g2.com36

gitnux.org33

conexisvmssoftware.com32

rfp.wiki29

446 of the 446 domain citations in answers naming Beeline came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-vendor-management-system-contingent-workforce72

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/vendor-management-system-vms-software-enterprise-202646

talentdesk.io/blog/best-vendor-management-systems43

talentdesk.io/blog/best-contingent-workforce-management-software42

aihratlas.com/categories/contingent-workforce-management40

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-contingent-workforce-management-software34

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-worker-software32

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-workforce-management-software28

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Beeline

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Beeline; a claim can dispute any of them.

Beeline Professional 2Beeline Enterprise 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beeline's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beeline, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at beeline.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.