Every category where a model named Magnit for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	9 of 97	20%	25	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Magnit yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Magnit across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	2	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	1	2	0	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	2	1	4
Mistral Small	1	0	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	1	1	1	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	2	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct19 labels1

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative20 labels7not counted in share

Budget-constrained12 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labels1

Negative10 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative68 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 11 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Market leader with a 17.4% share, known for integrated direct sourcing and statement-of-work (SOW) management, and strong global coverage.” Mistral Small · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice

“Choose Magnit if you have a mature, high-volume program and want industry-leading analytics and resource optimization.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice

“Leading VMS with ~17.4% market share ... with Magnit, SimplifyVMS, and SAP Fieldglass leading the enterprise segment.” MiniMax M2.5 · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice

“Largest market share leader (~17.4% in 2024) | Strong direct sourcing + statement-of-work (SOW) capabilities” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“usually not cost-effective for a budget-constrained company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative

“What to Avoid ... Enterprise-focused” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative

“Enterprise‑style pricing; more suited to companies with larger spend and more complex sourcing needs.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · soft negative

“often criticized for its user experience... Trustpilot score is notably low (around 1.9/5)” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Magnit, over the 68 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Magnit was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Fieldglass66 of 6822Not in the top three

Beeline62 of 6810Not in the top three

Workday VNDLY40 of 682Not in the top three

SimplifyVMS31 of 682Not in the top three

Coupa Contingent Workforce21 of 680Not in the top three

VectorVMS18 of 680Not in the top three

SimpleVMS16 of 688Not in the top three

Deel15 of 682Not in the top three

TalentDesk.io15 of 681Not in the top three

Upwork15 of 680Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Magnit. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 63 of the 68 answers that named Magnit and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrtechsaas.com50

talentdesk.io44

bestrecruitingtools.com36

worldmetrics.org35

aihratlas.com29

gitnux.org22

g2.com18

peoplemanagingpeople.com18

rfp.wiki16

conexisvmssoftware.com15

283 of the 283 domain citations in answers naming Magnit came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-vendor-management-system-contingent-workforce50

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/vendor-management-system-vms-software-enterprise-202636

talentdesk.io/blog/best-contingent-workforce-management-software30

aihratlas.com/categories/contingent-workforce-management29

talentdesk.io/blog/best-vendor-management-systems27

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-worker-software24

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-contingent-workforce-management-software17

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-workforce-management-software17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Magnit

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Magnit; a claim can dispute any of them.

Magnit (formerly PRO Unlimited) 2Magnit (formerly PRO Unlimited/Workforce Logiq) 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Magnit's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Magnit, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at magnitglobal.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.