Every category where a model named SAP Fieldglass for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	2%	18 of 97	51%	43	criticized challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SAP Fieldglass yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SAP Fieldglass across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	2	0	3
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	4	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	2	4
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	0	2	2	5
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2	4
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	0	3	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	3	4
Kimi K2	0	1	0	3	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	0	2	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct34 labels14

Paraphrase1 labelNone

Comparative31 labels10not counted in share

Budget-constrained29 labels8

Scale-constrained19 labels2

Negative19 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative133 labels in all, every segment counted; 24 of the 35 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Prefer highly rated VMS/MSPs like SAP Fieldglass, Beeline, or Magnit (4.5+ on G2, enterprise-focused with fewer complaints)” Grok 4.1 Fast · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · first choice

“Choose SAP Fieldglass if you are a large enterprise already deeply invested in the SAP ecosystem.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice

“SAP Fieldglass is the safest default "best overall" choice if you expect to scale” GPT-5.4 mini · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice

“The heavyweight champ of the enterprise VMS space... However, it requires a long implementation runway and significant budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid Enterprise-Heavy Solutions: SAP Fieldglass and some large enterprise VMS platforms may have "implementation complexity and cost structures that price out most mid-market buyers"” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · scale prompt · hard negative

“typically quote-only and aimed at large global programs — they're usually not cost-effective for a budget-constrained company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · hard negative

“Avoid Enterprise Solutions (like SAP Fieldglass) unless your program has over 1,000+ active contingent workers” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · hard negative

“Too complex and expensive; steep learning curve; designed for enterprises managing 50,000+ workers” Kimi K2 · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SAP Fieldglass, over the 133 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SAP Fieldglass was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Beeline115 of 1335Not in the top three

Magnit66 of 1338Not in the top three

Workday VNDLY54 of 1332Not in the top three

SimpleVMS40 of 13324Not in the top three

VectorVMS38 of 1330Not in the top three

Worksuite37 of 1336Not in the top three

SimplifyVMS36 of 1333Not in the top three

Deel33 of 1336Not in the top three

Coupa Contingent Workforce33 of 1330Not in the top three

TalentDesk.io28 of 1336Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SAP Fieldglass. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 116 of the 133 answers that named SAP Fieldglass and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

hrtechsaas.com79

talentdesk.io75

worldmetrics.org51

bestrecruitingtools.com50

aihratlas.com45

g2.com40

peoplemanagingpeople.com37

conexisvmssoftware.com33

gitnux.org32

rfp.wiki32

474 of the 474 domain citations in answers naming SAP Fieldglass came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-vendor-management-system-contingent-workforce79

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/vendor-management-system-vms-software-enterprise-202650

talentdesk.io/blog/best-vendor-management-systems48

aihratlas.com/categories/contingent-workforce-management44

talentdesk.io/blog/best-contingent-workforce-management-software44

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-contingent-workforce-management-software32

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-worker-software32

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-workforce-management-software27

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SAP Fieldglass

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SAP Fieldglass; a claim can dispute any of them.

Fieldglass 1Fieldglass (SAP) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SAP Fieldglass's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SAP Fieldglass, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at sapfieldglass.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.