Every category where a model named Worksuite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	11%	2 of 97	3%	30	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Worksuite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Worksuite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	2	0	0	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	4	0	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	1	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	1	0	3
Mistral Small	1	1	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	1	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct13 labels4

Paraphrase15 labels5

Comparative20 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained3 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative61 labels in all, every segment counted; 9 of the 14 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The leading options include Worksuite for established global freelancer programs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · first choice

“Worksuite is the industry gold standard for mid-market companies.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“is SimpleVMS, Worksuite, Conexis VMS, Gatekeeper, or Procurify” Llama 4 Maverick · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice

“Best Overall for Project-Based & Freelancers: Worksuite” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contingent workforce man · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Reviews of platforms like "Worksuite" often highlight a non-intuitive interface.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Worksuite, over the 61 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Worksuite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SAP Fieldglass37 of 613Not in the top three

Deel34 of 619Compare →

Beeline34 of 613Not in the top three

Upwork28 of 612Not in the top three

Fiverr24 of 612Not in the top three

TalentDesk.io22 of 613Not in the top three

Remote22 of 612Not in the top three

Worksome18 of 612Not in the top three

WorkMarket16 of 613Not in the top three

VectorVMS16 of 610Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Worksuite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 61 answers that named Worksuite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

talentdesk.io40

worldmetrics.org27

hrtechsaas.com21

wifitalents.com19

gitnux.org18

learn.g2.com17

peoplemanagingpeople.com17

g2.com16

worksuite.comYour site15

guideflow.com13

188 of the 203 domain citations in answers naming Worksuite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-vendor-management-system-contingent-workforce21

talentdesk.io/blog/best-contingent-workforce-management-software21

learn.g2.com/best-freelancer-management-systems15

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-contingent-workforce-management-software14

talentdesk.io/blog/best-vendor-management-systems14

worldmetrics.org/best/contingent-workforce-software14

guideflow.com/blog/freelancer-management-system13

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/freelance-management-system11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Worksuite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Worksuite; a claim can dispute any of them.

WorkSuite 1Worksuite (formerly TalentDesk.io) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Worksuite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Worksuite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at worksuite.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.