Every category where a model named WorkMarket for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	22 of 97	11%	9	under 10 labels · led by SimpleVMS at 35%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for WorkMarket yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated WorkMarket across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	1	2
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase9 labels4

Comparative14 labels3not counted in share

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative9 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Choose WorkMarket if you need strong workflow automation between your internal hiring managers and external suppliers.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative

“An enterprise-grade FMS designed to manage large-scale, on-demand, or field-based contractor workforces.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative

“Already using ADP or want modular rollout? → WorkMarket may fit” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Strong governance + compliance across internal teams and suppliers” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Contingent workforce man · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“they take a relatively hands-off approach to dispute resolution” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as WorkMarket, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and WorkMarket was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Upwork19 of 322Not in the top three

Deel17 of 322Not in the top three

Worksuite16 of 324Not in the top three

SAP Fieldglass16 of 323Not in the top three

Beeline16 of 320Not in the top three

Fiverr14 of 320Not in the top three

Remote13 of 320Not in the top three

Worksome12 of 321Not in the top three

TalentDesk.io10 of 322Not in the top three

Magnit8 of 324Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named WorkMarket. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 32 answers that named WorkMarket and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

talentdesk.io22

worldmetrics.org17

gitnux.org16

g2.com13

peoplemanagingpeople.com12

guideflow.com9

learn.g2.com9

wifitalents.com9

selectsoftwarereviews.com8

ubeya.com8

123 of the 123 domain citations in answers naming WorkMarket came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

talentdesk.io/blog/best-contingent-workforce-management-software17

gitnux.org/best/contingent-workforce-software12

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-contingent-workforce-management-software10

guideflow.com/blog/freelancer-management-system9

learn.g2.com/best-freelancer-management-systems9

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/freelance-management-system8

ubeya.com/blog/7-best-contingent-workforce-management-software-platforms8

cotocus.com/blog/top-10-workforce-marketplace-platforms-features-pros-cons-comparison7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as WorkMarket

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as WorkMarket; a claim can dispute any of them.

WorkMarket (by ADP) 2

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when WorkMarket's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as WorkMarket, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at workmarket.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.