Every category where a model named Worksome for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Contingent workforce management	Workforce planning and analytics	4%	6 of 97	0%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Worksome yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Worksome across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	1	1	0	2
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	1	0	1	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1	2
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct2 labels1

Paraphrase14 labels3

Comparative19 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained3 labels1

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative5 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative43 labels in all, every segment counted; 5 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“I'd generally recommend Worksome if your main need is managing contractors end-to-end” GPT-5.4 mini · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend Worksome as the best overall fit” Perplexity Sonar · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Worksome is heavily geared toward companies that scale up and scale down project teams quickly” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Contingent workforce man · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Other leading options include Worksuite, Worksome, Deel, Remote, SAP Fieldglass, and Beeline.” Llama 4 Maverick · Contingent workforce man · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Worksome, over the 43 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Worksome was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TalentDesk.io26 of 436Not in the top three

Deel26 of 432Not in the top three

SAP Fieldglass23 of 434Not in the top three

Upwork23 of 431Not in the top three

Beeline22 of 431Not in the top three

Remote19 of 430Not in the top three

Worksuite18 of 432Not in the top three

Fiverr14 of 430Not in the top three

WorkMarket12 of 433Not in the top three

Magnit11 of 436Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Worksome. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 40 of the 43 answers that named Worksome and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

talentdesk.io31

worldmetrics.org20

g2.com18

gitnux.org17

peoplemanagingpeople.com17

guideflow.com14

learn.g2.com14

wifitalents.com13

selectsoftwarereviews.com12

worksome.comYour site11

156 of the 167 domain citations in answers naming Worksome came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

talentdesk.io/blog/best-contingent-workforce-management-software21

guideflow.com/blog/freelancer-management-system14

learn.g2.com/best-freelancer-management-systems12

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-contingent-workforce-management-software11

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/freelance-management-system11

talentdesk.io/blog/best-freelancer-management-software11

hrtechsaas.com/blog/best-vendor-management-system-contingent-workforce10

workmotion.com/blog/freelancer-management-software10

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Worksome

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Worksome; a claim can dispute any of them.

TalentDesk/Worksome 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Worksome's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Worksome, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at worksome.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.