4 categories · RankedFindem
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Talent intelligence | Performance and talent management | 0% | 19 of 77 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger |
| Recruiting CRM and sourcing | Talent acquisition | 0% | 25 of 88 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20% |
| AI recruiting assistants | Talent acquisition | 0% | 58 of 84 | 33% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19% |
| Recruitment marketing and career sites | Talent acquisition | 0% | 60 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Teamtailor at 16% |
Movement
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best For: B2B companies looking for executive/leadership talent based on specific career trajectories” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · alternative
“Findem is the best tool to tap into this "warm" database.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative
“5. Findem - Built for mid-market and enterprise” MiniMax M2.5 · Recruiting CRM · direct prompt · alternative
“Findem: The Attribute-Based Search Innovator” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Talent intelligence · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Strong for diversity sourcing and hard-to-find candidates, but enterprise-priced ($25K–$100K+/yr).” DeepSeek V4 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · comparative prompt · soft negative
“priced for large orgs with dedicated TA ops teams... Probably overkill for mid-market.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Talent intelligence · direct prompt · soft negative
“Requires multi-week onboarding and its pricing is high (~$6,000/user/year)” Mistral Small · Talent intelligence · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 43 of the 53 answers that named Findem and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
173 of the 173 domain citations in answers naming Findem came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Findem's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Findem, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at findem.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.