Every category where a model named Humanly for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	25 of 84	12%	8	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%
Recruiting CRM and sourcing	Talent acquisition	0%	42 of 88	20%	5	under 10 labels · led by Lever at 20%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Humanly yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Humanly across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	0	1
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	2	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	1	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	0	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative11 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative1 labelNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Conversational AI screening | High-volume inbound and outbound” GLM 4.7 FlashX · AI recruiting assistants · comparative prompt · alternative

“Other options include Humanly, TheHireHub.AI, and Lever” Llama 4 Maverick · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative

“Humanly is a premier solution.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Proceed with caution and demand full audits of their algorithms.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · AI recruiting assistants · negative prompt · soft negative

“Focuses on middle-funnel conversion, not top-of-funnel sourcing” Kimi K2 · Recruiting CRM · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Humanly, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Humanly was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Gem14 of 183Not in the top three

SeekOut11 of 181Not in the top three

Juicebox11 of 180Not in the top three

hireEZ11 of 180Not in the top three

Manatal9 of 180Not in the top three

Loxo5 of 181Not in the top three

Eightfold AI5 of 180Not in the top three

Greenhouse5 of 180Not in the top three

HireVue5 of 180Not in the top three

LinkedIn Recruiter5 of 180Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Humanly. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 16 of the 18 answers that named Humanly and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com10

juicebox.ai7

leonar.app7

greenhouse.com6

metaview.ai6

hiretruffle.com5

lever.co5

firsthr.app4

guideflow.com4

matchr.io4

Fifty-eight of the fifty-eight domain citations in answers naming Humanly came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/best-candidate-sourcing-tools8

greenhouse.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-software6

leonar.app/blog/best-talent-sourcing-platforms6

guideflow.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software4

juicebox.ai/blog/best-sourcing-tools-for-recruiters4

matchr.io/blog/top-40-best-sourcing-tools4

dishertalent.com/blog/sourcing-tools-review3

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/sourcing-tools3

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Humanly's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Humanly, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at humanly.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.