HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › LinkedIn Hiring Assistant · September 2026 Edition

LinkedIn · 1 category · Named, not ranked

LinkedIn Hiring Assistant

2Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

1 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. LinkedIn Hiring Assistant was named 1 time in AI recruiting assistants, where GoPerfect led with 19%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market62 of 84

under the label threshold

Enterprise47 of 53

under the label threshold

In ai recruiting assistants · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named LinkedIn Hiring Assistant for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
AI recruiting assistants	Talent acquisition	0%	62 of 84	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by GoPerfect at 19%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LinkedIn Hiring Assistant yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LinkedIn Hiring Assistant across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative1 labelNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative0 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative2 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LinkedIn Hiring Assistant, over the 2 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LinkedIn Hiring Assistant was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Eightfold AI2 of 20Not in the top three

Paradox2 of 20Not in the top three

SmartRecruiters1 of 21Not in the top three

Gem1 of 20Not in the top three

GoodTime1 of 20Not in the top three

HireVue1 of 20Not in the top three

Humanly1 of 20Not in the top three

Indeed Smart Sourcing1 of 20Not in the top three

Manatal1 of 20Not in the top three

Metaview1 of 20Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LinkedIn Hiring Assistant. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 2 of the 2 answers that named LinkedIn Hiring Assistant and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

greenhouse.com2

guideflow.com2

herohunt.ai2

hiretruffle.com2

juicebox.ai2

monday.com2

pin.com2

sitepoint.com2

technologyadvice.com2

zapier.com2

Twenty of the twenty domain citations in answers naming LinkedIn Hiring Assistant came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

greenhouse.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-software2

guideflow.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software2

herohunt.ai/blog/best-ai-recruiting-tools-2026-15-ranked-and-priced2

hiretruffle.com/blog/ai-recruiting-software2

juicebox.ai/blog/best-ai-recruitment-tools2

monday.com/blog/ai-agents/ai-for-recruiting2

pin.com/blog/best-ai-recruiting-tools-20262

sitepoint.com/12-best-ai-recruiting-sourcing-tools-for-20262

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LinkedIn Hiring Assistant's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LinkedIn Hiring Assistant, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at linkedin.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.