Every category where a model named Litmos for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Online course libraries	Learning and development	2%	8 of 73	0%	5	under 10 labels · led by Udemy Business at 32%
Learning experience platforms	Learning and development	2%	9 of 80	20%	10	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Litmos yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Litmos across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	1	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	0	0	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	1	0	1	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	1	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	2	1	0	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct12 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels2

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative36 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Litmos and Docebo are often highlighted for their scalability, ease of integration, and comprehensive feature sets” Mistral Small · Learning experience plat · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Litmos offers the best balance of pre-built content library, compliance readiness, and B2B-specific integrations” MiniMax M2.5 · Online course libraries · direct prompt · first choice

“suitable for mid-sized teams that need training live quickly, with a large ready-made compliance content library” Llama 4 Maverick · Online course libraries · direct prompt · alternative

“Litmos: An incredibly user-friendly corporate LMS that comes packaged with an extensive, off-the-shelf library” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Online course libraries · direct prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“usually considered more LMS-oriented, but often part of LXP evaluations depending on the use case” GPT-5.4 mini · Learning experience plat · comparative prompt · soft negative

“Frequently described as "dated and clunky" with limited customization, weak reporting/analytics” Kimi K2 · Learning experience plat · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Litmos, over the 36 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Litmos was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Docebo22 of 361Not in the top three

360Learning17 of 363Not in the top three

Absorb LMS17 of 360Not in the top three

GoSkills15 of 368Not in the top three

TalentLMS14 of 362Not in the top three

Udemy Business13 of 363Not in the top three

LinkedIn Learning13 of 362Not in the top three

Cornerstone OnDemand11 of 360Not in the top three

Learn Amp9 of 365Not in the top three

Coursera for Business7 of 361Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Litmos. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 34 of the 36 answers that named Litmos and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

goskills.com19

docebo.com14

g2.com12

proprofstraining.com11

360learning.com10

digitalhumans.com9

boardinfinity.com8

walkme.com8

ispring.com7

thirst.io7

105 of the 105 domain citations in answers naming Litmos came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

goskills.com/resources/learning-experience-platforms14

digitalhumans.com/blog/the-10-best-learning-experience-platforms-lxp-reviewed-for-20269

360learning.com/blog/learning-experience-platforms8

boardinfinity.com/blog/best-lxp-platforms-for-corporate-training8

goskills.com/resources/best-lms-compared8

proprofstraining.com/blog/b2b-lms8

walkme.com/blog/best-lxp-platforms8

thirst.io/blog/top-12-learning-experience-platforms7

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Litmos

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Litmos; a claim can dispute any of them.

SAP Litmos 2SAP SuccessFactors Learning / Litmos 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Litmos's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Litmos, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at litmos.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.