HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Myers-Briggs Type Indicator · September 2026 Edition

Myers-Briggs · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

7Judge labels

0First choices

7Negative labels

5 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

1 label, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was named 1 time in Candidate assessment, where TestGorilla led with 68%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business87 of 87

under the label threshold

Mid-market91 of 101

under the label threshold

Enterprise72 of 73

under the label threshold

In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Myers-Briggs Type Indicator for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	91 of 101	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Myers-Briggs Type Indicator yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Myers-Briggs Type Indicator across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained0 labelsNone

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative6 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative7 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Skip Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) for hiring; its publisher deems it unethical due to low reliability” Grok 4.1 Fast · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, over the 7 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Myers-Briggs Type Indicator was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

TestGorilla3 of 71Not in the top three

Criteria Corp3 of 70Not in the top three

SHL3 of 70Not in the top three

Vervoe2 of 71Not in the top three

DISC2 of 70Not in the top three

HireVue2 of 70Not in the top three

Hogan Assessments2 of 70Not in the top three

TestTrick1 of 71Not in the top three

Truffle1 of 71Not in the top three

Alva Labs1 of 70Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 7 answers that named Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

sovaassessment.com4

drjohnsullivan.com3

linkedin.com3

aclu.org2

bestrecruitingtools.com2

codility.com2

cogn-iq.org2

eskill.com2

g2.com2

reddit.com2

Twenty-four of the twenty-four domain citations in answers naming Myers-Briggs Type Indicator came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

sovaassessment.com/blog/assessment-platform-mistakes-to-avoid-10-costly-errors-in-selectio4

drjohnsullivan.com/articles/5-worst-candidate-assessment-tools3

aclu.org/news/racial-justice/the-long-history-of-discrimination-in-job-hiring-assessments2

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-pre-employment-assessment-software-enterprise-20262

codility.com/how-to-choose-technical-assessment-platform2

testlify.com/guide-to-choose-the-best-talent-assessment-software2

adaface.com/digital-recruiting-tools1

analystrelations.org/2018/10/09/mq-shortcomings-or-how-not-to-use-the-gartner-magic-quadra1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator; a claim can dispute any of them.

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Myers-Briggs Type Indicator's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at myersbriggs.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.