HR AI Index

Index › Vendors › Hogan Assessments · September 2026 Edition

Hogan · 1 category · Named, not ranked

Hogan Assessments

11Judge labels

0First choices

5Negative labels

6 of 12Models named it

1Category

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.1, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

4 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Hogan Assessments was named 4 times in Candidate assessment, where TestGorilla led with 68%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small business84 of 87

under the label threshold

Mid-market80 of 101

under the label threshold

Enterprise20 of 73

under the label threshold

In candidate assessment · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Hogan Assessments for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Candidate assessment	Talent acquisition	0%	80 of 101	50%	4	under 10 labels · led by TestGorilla at 68%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Hogan Assessments yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Hogan Assessments across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct1 labelNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative3 labelsNone

Budget-constrained3 labelsNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Stick to established providers (e.g., Hogan, SHL, Criteria) if the employer insists on personality testing.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Candidate assessment · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Enterprise-grade legacy platforms (like SHL, Predictive Index, or Hogan) require expensive annual contracts and formal setup fees.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · soft negative

“Predictive Index, Hogan, SHL are more suited for that, but they’re much more expensive” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Candidate assessment · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Hogan Assessments, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Hogan Assessments was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

SHL10 of 110Not in the top three

TestGorilla8 of 113Not in the top three

Criteria Corp5 of 111Not in the top three

HireVue4 of 110Not in the top three

JobCannon4 of 110Not in the top three

The Predictive Index4 of 110Not in the top three

Vervoe3 of 112Not in the top three

TestDome3 of 111Not in the top three

Truffle3 of 111Not in the top three

Harver3 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Hogan Assessments. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 11 answers that named Hogan Assessments and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

jobcannon.io5

firsthr.app4

sigmundtest.com3

sovaassessment.com3

testgorilla.com3

adaface.com2

bestrecruitingtools.com2

clarity-hire.com2

corvirtus.com2

g2.com2

Twenty-eight of the twenty-eight domain citations in answers naming Hogan Assessments came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

jobcannon.io/compare/best-pre-employment-assessments5

firsthr.app/compare/hiring/pre-employment-assessment3

firsthr.app/compare/performance/talent-assessment-tools3

bestrecruitingtools.com/blog/best-pre-employment-assessment-software-enterprise-20262

clarity-hire.com/blog/criteria-corp-vs-shl-pricing-and-roi2

corvirtus.com/blog/10-red-flags-frontline-assessment-providers2

jobcannon.io/compare/top-5-hiring-assessment-platforms2

jobcannon.io/for-hiring2

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Hogan Assessments

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Hogan Assessments; a claim can dispute any of them.

Hogan 4

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Hogan Assessments's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Hogan Assessments, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hogan.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.