Every category where a model named Oracle Workforce Modeling for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Workforce planning	Workforce planning and analytics	0%	61 of 89	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by ChartHop at 31%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Oracle Workforce Modeling yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Oracle Workforce Modeling across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0
Mistral Small	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative7 labelsNone

Budget-constrained2 labels2

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative11 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Oracle Workforce Modeling, over the 11 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Oracle Workforce Modeling was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Anaplan11 of 114Not in the top three

Workday Adaptive Planning9 of 113Not in the top three

SAP SuccessFactors Workforce Planning6 of 110Not in the top three

Visier6 of 110Not in the top three

IBM Planning Analytics5 of 110Not in the top three

Orgvue4 of 110Not in the top three

Oracle Fusion Cloud HCM3 of 110Not in the top three

Planful3 of 110Not in the top three

ChartHop2 of 110Not in the top three

OrgChart2 of 110Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Oracle Workforce Modeling. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 11 of the 11 answers that named Oracle Workforce Modeling and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

guideflow.com10

worldmetrics.org10

peoplemanagingpeople.com8

cubesoftware.com7

articsledge.com6

learn.g2.com6

coefficient.io5

selectsoftwarereviews.com5

gitnux.org4

hrtechsaas.com4

Sixty-five of the sixty-five domain citations in answers naming Oracle Workforce Modeling came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

guideflow.com/blog/workforce-planning-software10

worldmetrics.org/best/workforce-planning-software10

peoplemanagingpeople.com/tools/best-workforce-planning-software8

articsledge.com/post/workforce-planning-software6

learn.g2.com/best-workforce-planning-software6

coefficient.io/cfo-resources/strategic-workforce-planning-tools5

cubesoftware.com/blog/workforce-planning-software5

selectsoftwarereviews.com/buyer-guide/workforce-planning-software5

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Oracle Workforce Modeling's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Oracle Workforce Modeling, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at oracle.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.